1qGLG9p
1qGLG9p
1qGLG9p
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
8 Deleveraging, What Deleveraging<br />
incentive for a government to deliver growth-friendly policies is weakened if<br />
domestic residents enjoy only a limited gain from extra output. In addition, a<br />
high outstanding level of debt increases fragility in funding markets: the higher<br />
level of rollover risk that is associated with a large outstanding stock of debt means<br />
that new lenders may be unwilling to provide funds due to the risk of market<br />
disruptions. Empirical studies indicate that high external debt is associated with<br />
poorer macroeconomic outcomes and greater vulnerability to external crises<br />
(Cordella et al., 2005; Imbs and Ranciere, 2008; Reinhart and Rogoff, 2010; Catao<br />
and Milesi-Ferretti, 2013).<br />
In addition to the acute and chronic impact of high debt levels, leverage also<br />
alters the macroeconomic dynamics in response to various cyclical shocks. In<br />
general, the procyclical characteristics of the leverage cycle (rising incomes and<br />
asset prices boosting borrowing capacity; declining incomes and asset prices<br />
squeezing borrowing capacity) imply that the amplitude and duration of the<br />
business cycle are larger compared to those expected in economies without<br />
financial frictions. Moreover, leverage also increases the vulnerability of the<br />
real economy to financial shocks by affecting the responses of spending levels<br />
and productive capacity to shifts in financial conditions. These features have<br />
been studied in a range of recent macroeconomic models that study leverage at<br />
the household, firm, bank and sovereign levels and at the aggregate level (see,<br />
amongst others, Bernanke and Gertler, 1989; Devereux et al., 2006; Mendoza,<br />
2010; Eggertsson and Krugman, 2012; Midrigan and Philippon, 2012; Corsetti<br />
et al., 2013; Martin and Philippon, 2014). In Section 3, we provide a stylised<br />
framework linking leverage to output dynamics.<br />
Finally, it is important to appreciate how financial globalisation means that<br />
cross-border dimensions of leverage are increasingly important. At one level,<br />
cross-border funding is an important driver of domestic credit dynamics (Lane<br />
and McQuade, 2014). Moreover, the aggregate level of credit in an economy is<br />
also determined by direct cross-border lending and bond issuance that bypasses<br />
the domestic financial system (Borio et al., 2011). In Section 4, we highlight that<br />
the external dimension of debt is especially important for the euro periphery and<br />
deficit-running emerging markets.<br />
1.3 Guide to the report<br />
The rest of the report is structured as follows. In Chapter 2, we set the scene by<br />
describing the evolution of debt levels around the world; this empirical review<br />
is comprehensive in examining sector-level developments as well as aggregate<br />
leverage patterns.<br />
Chapter 3 provides some conceptual frameworks that can help guide the<br />
interpretation of debt dynamics and the ongoing poisonous interaction between<br />
financial crisis and output dynamics. First, we outline the nature of the leverage<br />
cycle, a pattern repeated across economies and over time in which a reasonable<br />
enthusiasm about economic growth becomes overblown, fostering the belief that<br />
there is a greater capacity to take on debt than is actually the case. A financial