26.12.2014 Views

1qGLG9p

1qGLG9p

1qGLG9p

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 Deleveraging, What Deleveraging<br />

incentive for a government to deliver growth-friendly policies is weakened if<br />

domestic residents enjoy only a limited gain from extra output. In addition, a<br />

high outstanding level of debt increases fragility in funding markets: the higher<br />

level of rollover risk that is associated with a large outstanding stock of debt means<br />

that new lenders may be unwilling to provide funds due to the risk of market<br />

disruptions. Empirical studies indicate that high external debt is associated with<br />

poorer macroeconomic outcomes and greater vulnerability to external crises<br />

(Cordella et al., 2005; Imbs and Ranciere, 2008; Reinhart and Rogoff, 2010; Catao<br />

and Milesi-Ferretti, 2013).<br />

In addition to the acute and chronic impact of high debt levels, leverage also<br />

alters the macroeconomic dynamics in response to various cyclical shocks. In<br />

general, the procyclical characteristics of the leverage cycle (rising incomes and<br />

asset prices boosting borrowing capacity; declining incomes and asset prices<br />

squeezing borrowing capacity) imply that the amplitude and duration of the<br />

business cycle are larger compared to those expected in economies without<br />

financial frictions. Moreover, leverage also increases the vulnerability of the<br />

real economy to financial shocks by affecting the responses of spending levels<br />

and productive capacity to shifts in financial conditions. These features have<br />

been studied in a range of recent macroeconomic models that study leverage at<br />

the household, firm, bank and sovereign levels and at the aggregate level (see,<br />

amongst others, Bernanke and Gertler, 1989; Devereux et al., 2006; Mendoza,<br />

2010; Eggertsson and Krugman, 2012; Midrigan and Philippon, 2012; Corsetti<br />

et al., 2013; Martin and Philippon, 2014). In Section 3, we provide a stylised<br />

framework linking leverage to output dynamics.<br />

Finally, it is important to appreciate how financial globalisation means that<br />

cross-border dimensions of leverage are increasingly important. At one level,<br />

cross-border funding is an important driver of domestic credit dynamics (Lane<br />

and McQuade, 2014). Moreover, the aggregate level of credit in an economy is<br />

also determined by direct cross-border lending and bond issuance that bypasses<br />

the domestic financial system (Borio et al., 2011). In Section 4, we highlight that<br />

the external dimension of debt is especially important for the euro periphery and<br />

deficit-running emerging markets.<br />

1.3 Guide to the report<br />

The rest of the report is structured as follows. In Chapter 2, we set the scene by<br />

describing the evolution of debt levels around the world; this empirical review<br />

is comprehensive in examining sector-level developments as well as aggregate<br />

leverage patterns.<br />

Chapter 3 provides some conceptual frameworks that can help guide the<br />

interpretation of debt dynamics and the ongoing poisonous interaction between<br />

financial crisis and output dynamics. First, we outline the nature of the leverage<br />

cycle, a pattern repeated across economies and over time in which a reasonable<br />

enthusiasm about economic growth becomes overblown, fostering the belief that<br />

there is a greater capacity to take on debt than is actually the case. A financial

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!