26.12.2014 Views

1qGLG9p

1qGLG9p

1qGLG9p

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5 Policy issues<br />

5.1 What have we learnt from past crises<br />

In our report we have focused on both the debt build-up preceding the last ‘great’<br />

crisis and the post-crisis adjustment. Our analysis suggests that, pre-crisis, debt<br />

in advanced economies had increased above their capacity to bear it. Amongst<br />

emerging markets, China may now be in a similar situation and other countries<br />

in that group also show signs of fragility.<br />

From an ex ante perspective, policymakers must seek to prevent excessive debt<br />

accumulation because this makes the economy vulnerable to macroeconomic<br />

and/or asset price shocks which, in turn, may require subsequent painful<br />

adjustment. 27 Ex post, if an adjustment must take place, policy also has a role to<br />

play in alleviating its costs to the economy. Our case studies evaluate the results<br />

of different policy choices and point to difficult trade-offs between further debt<br />

accumulation to prevent stagnation of the real economy and debt consolidation<br />

at the cost of stagnation.<br />

In what follows, we highlight the main policy lessons that we draw from the<br />

experience of the last 20 years.<br />

(i) Preventing excessive leverage and debt crises<br />

In effect, it is a policy decision to let a country lever up above its means (that<br />

is, above its debt capacity). This may happen because policymakers view<br />

extremely high economic growth rates and advantageous borrowing conditions<br />

as permanent rather than temporary (as was the case in Ireland and Spain during<br />

the convergence period and after the launch of the euro), or because they use<br />

leverage to try to fight a persistent private-sector slowdown (as in China since<br />

2008), or perhaps because they are just trying to squeeze the benefits of financial<br />

innovation to grow above the potential rates determined by the supply side of the<br />

economy, as was the case in the US at the beginning of this century. Moreover, in<br />

some cases, policymakers acted as cheerleaders for the process of excesses in the<br />

private sector and exposed the balance sheets of central and local governments to<br />

similar vulnerabilities. Thus, a clear-eyed recognition of the actual debt capacity<br />

27 The political economy of debt management is made more complex by the possible interconnections<br />

between the growth in household debt and underlying shifts in income distribution (see, amongst<br />

others, Rajan, 2010).<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!