TPF-C Technology Plan - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chapter 7 7.5.6 Secondary Mirror Tower Partial Structure Testbed Scope The current plan is to have this testbed competed, designed and built through Phase A, with model validation and other technology objectives completed in the early-to-mid-Phase B time frame. The secondary mirror tower partial structure testbed has achieved TRL 3. The testbed schedule is given in Table 7-16. Table 7-16. Secondary Mirror Tower Partial Structure Testbed Schedule Planned Completion Date Planned Activities Performance Targets TRL Phase A Design and build testbed Test materials and subcomponents individually prior to testbed integration Design testbed, hinge/latch and metrology system consistent with 25 nm SM stability requirement above 1 Hz 3, 4 Validate sub-component models Phase B Perform tests and validate testbed models Validate microdynamic bounding analyses on flight-like hardware for 25 nm SM stability requirement above 1 Hz 5, 6 126
Plan for Technology Development 7.5.7 Pointing Control Testbed Scope The goals of the Pointing Control Testbed are to demonstrate both the capability to deliver very high precision pointing and to reject disturbances at the coronagraph using fine guidance sensor (FGS) measurements coupled with a fine steering mirror (FSM) pointing control. Additional capabilities required are rigid body pointing of the entire payload using reaction wheels, lowbandwidth steering of the secondary mirror, and perhaps pointing offset of the payload using active isolation actuators. In pre-Phase A, we will focus on analysis and data collection of the various sensor components. In Phase A, we will develop key pieces of the testbed, and perform open-loop tests of the FSM and FGS. In Phase B, the method for verifying the measured performance versus the modeled performance (a “scoring system”) will be developed; the requirements for isolation levels will be defined; and closed-loop performance of the FGS/FSM/optical path, acquisition sensor, and disturbance rejection will be tested. The pointing control testbed has achieved TRL 3. The testbed schedule is given in Table 7-17. Table 7-17. Pointing Control Testbed Schedule Planned Completion Date Planned Activities Performance Targets TRL Phase A Implement FGS camera Implement FSM control loop Develop disturbance generators Demonstrate open-loop pointing control accuracy, resolution and 50 Hz bandwidth on FSM Demonstrate measurement accuracy of 1 mas on FGS sensor at 500 Hz; meet tighter requirements in Phase B Develop capability to induce modeled vibration into testbed, required in Phase B 5 Phase B Develop validation “scoreboard” Design and build isolated testbed Test FSM/FGS/optical path subsystem element. Test acquisition camera accuracy Test integrated system with disturbance input. Demonstrate capability for validating high-precision pointing Demonstrate isolation required for integrated testing Demonstrate pointing accuracy to 0.3 mas jitter, 0.3 offset at subassembly level with controlled disturbances, in vacuum chamber Show 10 mas accuracy/axis for stars brighter than roughly 10,000 electrons signal Demonstrate ability to reject disturbances to testbed using FSM/FGS/optical path simulation to full performance (currently ~0.3mas 1 sigma jitter) 5,6 127
Page 1 and 2:
JPL Publication 05-8 Technology Pla
Page 3:
TECHNOLOGY PLAN TERRESTRIAL PLANET
Page 6 and 7:
Recent Highlights Technical progres
Page 8 and 9:
Figure i-4. Deformable mirror deliv
Page 10 and 11:
Table of Contents Approvals........
Page 12 and 13:
7.5.2 Precision Hexapod............
Page 14 and 15:
Chapter 1 Figure 1-1. Artist's impr
Page 16 and 17:
Chapter 1 interferometry, continues
Page 18 and 19:
Chapter 1 Back end coronagraph opti
Page 20 and 21:
Chapter 1 Surrounding the whole tel
Page 22 and 23:
Chapter 1 Pol. BS fold/steering Mic
Page 24 and 25:
Chapter 1 1.6.5 Sunshield The teles
Page 26 and 27:
Chapter 1 expected architecture dow
Page 28 and 29:
Chapter 1 Table 1-3. TPF-C Technolo
Page 30 and 31:
Chapter 1 3B: Demonstrate, using th
Page 32 and 33:
Chapter 2 2 Error Budgets 2.1 Contr
Page 34 and 35:
Chapter 2 Error Budget Validation G
Page 36 and 37:
Chapter 2 Further, it is shown that
Page 38 and 39:
Chapter 2 Table 2-1. Requirement on
Page 40 and 41:
Chapter 3 3 Optics and Starlight Su
Page 42 and 43:
Chapter 3 are in progress with cont
Page 44 and 45:
Chapter 3 Figure 3-5. Coronagraph s
Page 46 and 47:
Chapter 3 (though not light-weight
Page 48 and 49:
Chapter 3 Table 3-3. ITT Metrology
Page 50 and 51:
Chapter 3 observations. The time it
Page 52 and 53:
Chapter 3 vacuum-compatible, low-po
Page 54 and 55:
Chapter 3 blank size. Westerhoff et
Page 56 and 57:
Chapter 3 configurations, performan
Page 58 and 59:
Chapter 3 Figure 3-10: Plots showin
Page 60 and 61:
Chapter 3 The wavefront quality of
Page 62 and 63:
Chapter 3 Figure 3-13. Optical layo
Page 64 and 65:
Chapter 3 algorithms have limitatio
Page 66 and 67:
Chapter 3 simulated star source is
Page 68 and 69:
Chapter 4 Figure 4-1. Overview of t
Page 70 and 71:
Chapter 4 enclosures, and stable la
Page 72 and 73:
Chapter 4 facilities from which dat
Page 74 and 75:
Chapter 4 Figure 4-5. Microslip Tri
Page 76 and 77:
Chapter 4 Figure 4-7. Calibration o
Page 78 and 79:
Chapter 4 Figure 4-8. Comparison of
Page 80 and 81:
Chapter 4 4.2 Subsystem and System
Page 82 and 83:
Chapter 4 Figure 4-11. Schematic of
Page 84 and 85:
Chapter 4 Figure 4-12. Fine guiding
Page 86 and 87:
Chapter 4 (5) The Fine Steering Mir
Page 88 and 89: Chapter 4 Third, precise thermal co
Page 90 and 91: Chapter 4 giving confidence that fl
Page 92 and 93: Chapter 4 surface polish is nonethe
Page 94 and 95: Chapter 5 TPF-C is planning a suite
Page 96 and 97: Chapter 5 engineering judgment (i.e
Page 98 and 99: Chapter 5 categories, in reality ea
Page 100 and 101: Chapter 5 Table 5-3. Validation of
Page 102 and 103: Chapter 5 5.6.1 Modeling Methodolog
Page 104 and 105: Chapter 5 strength of computer simu
Page 106 and 107: Chapter 6 6 Instrument Technology a
Page 108 and 109: Chapter 6 Figure 6-1. Detailed conc
Page 110 and 111: Chapter 6 The first method is self-
Page 112 and 113: Chapter 6 super computers and is us
Page 114 and 115: Chapter 7 7 Plan for Technology Dev
Page 116 and 117: Chapter 7 Figure 7-1. TPF-C Technol
Page 118 and 119: Chapter 7 Improvements to the DM ov
Page 120 and 121: Chapter 7 7.3 Error Budgets 7.3.1 D
Page 122 and 123: Chapter 7 7.4 Optics and Starlight
Page 124 and 125: Chapter 7 7.4.2 Apodizing Masks and
Page 126 and 127: Chapter 7 7.4.4 Wavefront Sensing a
Page 128 and 129: Chapter 7 7.4.6 Transmissive Optics
Page 130 and 131: Chapter 7 7.4.8 Scatterometer Scope
Page 132 and 133: Chapter 7 7.5 Structural, Thermal,
Page 134 and 135: Chapter 7 7.5.3 Precision Structura
Page 136 and 137: Chapter 7 model of TPF-C and should
Page 140 and 141: Chapter 7 7.5.8 Sub-scale EM Sunshi
Page 142 and 143: Chapter 7 7.6 Integrated Modeling a
Page 144 and 145: Chapter 7 7.7.3 Advanced Concepts:
Page 146 and 147: Chapter 8 134
Page 148 and 149: Appendices Appendix B: TPF-C Detail
Page 150 and 151: Appendices Appendix D: TPF-C Techno
Page 152 and 153: Appendices Appendix F: Acronym List
Page 154: Appendices RWA SAO SBIR SIM SM SMFA
show all

TPF-C Technology Plan - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?