19.01.2015 Views

TPF-C Technology Plan - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA

TPF-C Technology Plan - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA

TPF-C Technology Plan - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Structural, Thermal, and Spacecraft <strong>Technology</strong><br />

noise from the laboratory environment to much better than 1 mg. Using the Lockheed Martin<br />

DFP is a possibility since it is capable of at least 40 dB of vibration attenuation, and as an active<br />

system can be used to simulate the input of RWA disturbances through the telescope system.<br />

Other disturbances can be incorporated to drive the microdynamic instabilities such as base<br />

shakers, heaters, and shear loading devices near the hinge/latch interfaces.<br />

The test article itself will be appropriately mass loaded so as to provide the same inertia to the<br />

truncated tower as would the full-length flight tower. The primary goal is to exercise the<br />

mechanisms in the right frequency regimes and inertial loading configurations.<br />

The position stability of the assembly will be monitored through a suite of precision instruments<br />

such as a displacement interferometer, micro-g accelerometers, nano-strain gauges, eddy current<br />

sensors, temperature sensors, and load cells. This instrumentation suite will enable the highfrequency<br />

measurements of relative tower motions, harmonic distortions, hysteresis, modal<br />

frequencies and damping, and acoustic emissions—all phenomena that can adversely impact the<br />

SM stability requirement.<br />

Materials and testbed sub-components are expected to be tested individually prior to testbed<br />

assembly. The testbed data will then be used to validate the assembled testbed model, focusing<br />

primarily on the interface models and nonlinearities. Material and sub-component testing can be<br />

performed as part of the Precision Structural Stability Characterization activity at JPL and/or at<br />

the contractor facility. In any case, although the contractor will be responsible for delivering<br />

validated models of the testbeds, <strong>NASA</strong> will conduct an independent modeling activity for<br />

verification.<br />

Progress to Date<br />

This activity is currently in the requirements definition and planning stage. No other resources<br />

have been allocated for this particular testbed activity up to this time. Other technology<br />

developments currently being investigated will feed into this activity, in particular the Precision<br />

Structural Stability Characterization testbed suite.<br />

4.2.3 Pointing Control Testbed (PCT)<br />

Objective<br />

<strong>TPF</strong>-C faces challenging pointing requirements. The major pointing requirements are (1)<br />

maintain stability of the telescope pointing to 4 mas 1σ /axis, and (2) direct the star light to the<br />

coronagraph mask to an accuracy that maintains an “acceptable” contrast ratio that results in a<br />

trade between jitter and offset requirements, as shown in Figure 4-12, which refers to the<br />

previous pointing requirement. Currently, if there is a pointing offset (bias) of 0.3 mas, the<br />

pointing jitter can be up to 0.3 mas 1σ, RMS. This fine pointing mode was recently relaxed by a<br />

factor of nearly 8 from what is shown in Figure 4-12. The objective of the pointing control<br />

testbed is to demonstrate the required sub-mas pointing.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!