20.01.2015 Views

Derrington 2012 thesis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Derrington 2012 thesis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Derrington 2012 thesis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

perception of disruptive behaviour might be different from others because they attend<br />

a school for students with emotional and behavioural problems and are likely to<br />

witness challenging behaviour on a regular basis. They therefore either score<br />

themselves by comparing to others, according to their own set of rules, or trying to<br />

guess how others perceive their behaviour.<br />

6.2.4 The Beck Inventories for Youth: inferential statistics<br />

Having investigated the change scores with descriptive statistics, changes in the data<br />

from before to after music therapy were then analysed using SPSS (5.8). Parametric<br />

statistics from a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were based on the<br />

assumptions that the data have a normal distribution and groups have equal variance.<br />

Levene’s test was used to look for equal differences in the variances in the different<br />

groups (appendix 6.2f). The degrees of freedom control the size of the effect that is<br />

being looked at and this proved to be non-significant because the p-values were 0.22,<br />

0.4825 and 0.992 for BSCI, BAI and BDBI change scores respectively. This meant<br />

that the null hypo<strong>thesis</strong> of equal variances could not be rejected and the MANOVA<br />

model could be reliably used.<br />

The findings from the MANOVA (appendix 6.2g) revealed that the change scores for<br />

each inventory were neither dependent on which school the student attended nor in<br />

which group they participated. The interaction between these groups was also<br />

insignificant. This meant that, had any effect of school been found, it would have<br />

been independent of group and vice versa.<br />

The tests showed that the only thing which had a significant effect at the pre-defined<br />

5% level on the change scores of the BSCI was the baseline score (p-value = 0.001).<br />

So, regardless of school, group, or other baseline scores, the self-reported selfconcept<br />

inventory made by students before music therapy was shown to influence<br />

their change score in BSCI so much that nothing else in the model could further<br />

explain any of the change.<br />

The only thing that was important in predicting how the BDBI would change was the<br />

student’s self-reported disruptive behaviour results they reported before music<br />

! "%(!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!