1FW2e8F
1FW2e8F
1FW2e8F
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SECTION 1 2 3<br />
WHAT CAN BE DONE<br />
to 5.3 million – following the abolition of school fees. 463 Fee abolition is critical<br />
to tackling economic inequality, and boosting opportunities for the poorest.<br />
However, the quality of the education on offer has suffered in those countries<br />
which have failed to match the increase in enrolment with adequate<br />
investments in trained teachers, facilities and materials – a situation made<br />
more difficult by faltering donor commitments and falling government budgets<br />
due to the global economic crisis. This risks reinforcing inequalities in the<br />
quality of education between the public and private sectors, and between<br />
the poorest and wealthiest children.<br />
Beyond school fee abolition, additional targeted investments are needed<br />
to provide the most marginalized children with high-quality education.<br />
These include extra funding for schools in rural and under-served areas,<br />
policies to address other financial barriers to poor children’s access to<br />
education (such as uniforms, transportation and learning materials),<br />
and more accountability for education quality through active community<br />
involvement in school management.<br />
Some countries are leading the way. For example, Brazil has championed<br />
reforms that increase access to good quality education and allocate more<br />
spending to the education of poor children, often in indigenous and black<br />
communities. 464 These reforms have helped to reduce inequality of access<br />
since the mid-1990s: the average number of years spent in school by the<br />
poorest 20 percent of children has doubled – from four years to eight years. 465<br />
Investment in education and healthcare played a key part in Brazil’s recent<br />
success in reducing inequality.<br />
A number of East Asian countries, including South Korea, Japan and Singapore,<br />
have implemented programmes specifically designed to promote equitable<br />
learning, including investing in high-quality teachers. Even the poorest<br />
students are now learning above the minimum threshold. 466 There is solid<br />
evidence that making equity an explicit goal of education policy can lead<br />
to improved educational outcomes across the board.<br />
Public investment in healthcare and education for all citizens is a powerful<br />
tool for addressing inequality, and these examples demonstrate that change<br />
is possible, even in the face of powerful special interests.<br />
Aid can tackle inequality and political capture<br />
Taxation and domestic resource mobilization are critical to boosting public<br />
spending. For some countries, harnessing aid and investing it well, for instance<br />
into good-quality public services that citizens need and demand, has also<br />
helped to reduce poverty and inequality through supporting national public<br />
service plans and boosting public spending.<br />
In 2004, just over a quarter of the aid received by Rwanda – a country that had<br />
spent 10 years rebuilding national institutions and economic stability following<br />
the 1994 genocide – was budget support: long-term aid that can support<br />
health and education systems, as well as institution strengthening. Steady<br />
growth in budget support up to 2004 allowed the government to eliminate fees<br />
for primary and lower-secondary school education, increase spending<br />
99