1FW2e8F
1FW2e8F
1FW2e8F
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SECTION 1 2 3<br />
EXTREME INEQUALITY<br />
on the quality of life of individuals and communities, especially for women<br />
and marginalized groups.<br />
Violence, and equally the fear of violence, often leads to people cutting<br />
themselves off from the rest of society, something that is most starkly<br />
illustrated by people living in gated communities. As Joan Clos, the Director<br />
of UN-Habitat puts it: ‘The gated community represents the segregation of<br />
the population. Those who are gated are choosing to gate, to differentiate,<br />
to protect themselves from the rest of the city.’ 253<br />
INEQUALITY PUTS THE LIVES OF THE POOREST AT RISK<br />
IN CRISES AND DISASTERS<br />
Risk is not shared equally across society; the most vulnerable and<br />
marginalized are more affected by crises, pushing them further into<br />
poverty. Those who are hit hardest in times of crisis are always the<br />
poorest, because they spend a much higher proportion of their income<br />
on food and do not have access to welfare or social protection schemes,<br />
insurance, or savings to help them withstand an emergency.<br />
Extreme inequality of wealth and power also drives national and<br />
international policies that shelter the rich from risk, passing this on<br />
to the poor and powerless. Countries with higher levels of economic<br />
inequality have more vulnerable populations. 254<br />
Inequality between countries explains why 81 percent of disaster deaths<br />
are in low-income and lower-middle income countries, even though they<br />
account for only 33 percent of disasters. 255<br />
“<br />
Our approach has been<br />
to look to reduce inequalities.<br />
That is at the centre of<br />
our policies on Disaster<br />
Risk Reduction, because<br />
inequality just increases<br />
vulnerability.<br />
MARÍA CECILIA RODRIGUÉZ<br />
MINISTER OF SECURITY,<br />
ARGENTINA 256<br />
“<br />
THE EQUALITY INSTINCT<br />
Across the world, religion, literature, folklore and philosophy show remarkable<br />
confluence in their concern that the gap between rich and poor is inherently<br />
unfair and morally wrong. That this concern with distribution is so prevalent<br />
across different cultures and societies suggests a fundamental preference<br />
for fairness and equitable societies.<br />
One of the most influential modern political philosophers, John Rawls, asks us<br />
to imagine that we are under a ‘veil of ignorance’ and know nothing about the<br />
various advantages, social or natural, that we are born into. What principles of<br />
a good society would we then agree on One of the most convincing principles<br />
that emerges from this thought experiment, states that, ‘Social and economic<br />
inequalities are to be arranged so that they [societies] are both (a) to the<br />
greatest expected benefit of the least advantaged and (b) attached to offices<br />
and positions open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity.’ 257<br />
Our preference for fairness and equality are further demonstrated by surveys<br />
from around the world, which consistently show a desire for more equitable<br />
societies. 258 An Oxfam survey across six countries (Spain, Brazil, India, South<br />
Africa, the UK and the USA) found that a majority of people believe that<br />
the distance between the wealthiest in society and the rest is too great.<br />
In Brazil, 80 percent agreed with that statement.<br />
“<br />
To be wealthy and<br />
honoured in an<br />
unjust society<br />
is a disgrace.<br />
MAHATMA GANDHI<br />
“<br />
52