1FW2e8F
1FW2e8F
1FW2e8F
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SECTION 1 2 3<br />
EXTREME INEQUALITY<br />
The same economic medicine worldwide<br />
In countries around the world, during the 1980s and 1990s, increases in<br />
government debt led creditors (principally the IMF and the World Bank) to<br />
impose a cold shower of deregulation, privatization, and financial and trade<br />
liberalization, alongside rapid reductions in public spending, an end to price<br />
stabilization and other public support measures to the rural sector. Generous<br />
tax cuts were provided for corporations and the wealthy, and a ‘race to the<br />
bottom’ to weaken labour rights began, while regulations to protect employees,<br />
such as maternity leave and the right to organize, as well as anti-competition<br />
laws to stop monopolies and financial rules to protected consumers,<br />
were abolished.<br />
In East Asia, the shift to liberalization started in the early 1990s and was<br />
accelerated following the 1997 financial crisis that paved the way for IMFimposed<br />
public sector reforms, known as ‘structural adjustment programmes’.<br />
These programmes were implemented in many countries, such as Thailand,<br />
South Korea and Indonesia, which subsequently experienced an increase in<br />
levels of economic inequality. In Indonesia, the number of people living on less<br />
than $2 a day rose from 100 million in 1996 to 135 million in 1999; 263 since 1999<br />
inequality has risen by almost a quarter. 264<br />
Across Africa, rapid market liberalization, under structural adjustment<br />
programmes, increased poverty, hunger and inequality in many<br />
countries. Between 1996 and 2001, the number of Zambians living below the<br />
poverty line rose from 69 to 86 percent; in Malawi, this number increased from<br />
60 to 65 percent over the same period. 265 In Tanzania, inequality rose by 28<br />
percent. 266 By 2013, across the continent an extra 50 million people were undernourished<br />
compared to 1990–92. 267<br />
In the countries of the former Eastern bloc, market fundamentalism after<br />
the fall of communism in 1989–91 led to economic reforms which focused<br />
on liberalization and deregulation, and resulted in a significant increase in<br />
poverty and inequality. In Russia, the Gini coefficient almost doubled in the<br />
20 years from 1991, and the incomes of the richest 10 percent of the population<br />
are now over 17 times that of the poorest 10 percent, an increase from four<br />
times in the 1980s. Meanwhile the wealthiest one percent of Russians – who<br />
greatly benefitted from the opaque process of privatization during the 1990s –<br />
now hold 71 percent of the national wealth. 268<br />
Increases in poverty and inequality were lower in the countries of East Central<br />
Europe, such as Hungary and the Czech Republic, where the governments<br />
played a key role in regulating the market and responded to soaring levels<br />
of poverty. 269<br />
56