1FW2e8F
1FW2e8F
1FW2e8F
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SECTION 1 2 3<br />
WHAT CAN BE DONE<br />
THE LOW ROAD: GENDER-BLIND<br />
POLICY PRESCRIPTIONS<br />
Failure to consider the particular situation of women and girls can unwittingly<br />
lead governments to reinforce gender inequalities or end up giving with one<br />
hand while taking away with the other. In China, successful efforts to create<br />
new jobs for women were accompanied by cutbacks in state and employer<br />
support for childcare and elderly care, which conversely increased women’s<br />
unpaid work. 479<br />
Fiscal policy can also have unintended negative impacts on women and girls.<br />
Tax cuts designed to stimulate economic growth, whether made to income<br />
taxes or to corporate taxes, benefit men far more than women because the<br />
largest benefits of such cuts go to those with the highest incomes and<br />
corporate share ownership. A recent study in Ghana found that an indirect tax<br />
on kerosene, used for cooking fuel in low-income urban and rural households,<br />
is paid mostly by women. 480<br />
However, direct taxes on those that can most afford them are essential,<br />
as countries with reduced tax revenues have less capacity to deal with<br />
economic crises, and end up having to introduce austerity measures to<br />
balance their budgets. When austerity budgets call for reduced public sector<br />
employment, these layoffs hit women hardest because they are heavily<br />
represented in the public sector. When austerity cuts reduce public services,<br />
not only does this place an undue burden on women, it also makes it more<br />
difficult for them to get a job. According to research conducted on the impact<br />
of austerity in Europe, 481 after the financial crisis mothers of small children were<br />
less likely to be employed than before and more likely to attribute their lack of<br />
employment to cuts to care services. 482<br />
Governments have come together time and again to commit to eradicating<br />
gender inequality. The Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of<br />
Discrimination against Women obliges states to eliminate discrimination<br />
and differences in treatment between women and men ‘by all appropriate<br />
means’. In addition, the 1995 Beijing Platform for Action calls for an approach<br />
to macroeconomic and development policy which addresses the needs and<br />
efforts of women in poverty and promotes a ‘more equitable distribution of<br />
productive assets, wealth, opportunities, income and services’. 483 Now is the<br />
time to make good on these commitments.<br />
THE HIGH ROAD: THE RIGHT POLICIES CAN<br />
PROMOTE WOMEN’S ECONOMIC EQUALITY<br />
Many of the policies that reduce economic inequality also have a huge impact<br />
on reducing gender inequality. Free primary education and free healthcare<br />
disproportionately benefit women and girls. Public services are more used<br />
by women; they ensure the state takes some of the burden of care away<br />
from women, whether it is healthcare or childcare. Social protection grants,<br />
such as universal child benefits, also have a big impact on gender inequality.<br />
Regulations around minimum wages and job security, as well as those that<br />
guarantee paid holiday, sick leave and maternity leave, all help to narrow the<br />
105