1FW2e8F
1FW2e8F
1FW2e8F
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SECTION 1 2 3<br />
WHAT CAN BE DONE<br />
fiscal policies that tackle inequality. There is also strong recognition among<br />
credible actors that the global tax system is not working.<br />
Sailing against strong winds<br />
Almost nine months after Macky Sall’s election as President of Senegal in<br />
2012, the country adopted a new tax code to raise revenue to finance public<br />
services. This reform simplified the tax rules, increased corporate income tax<br />
from 25 to 30 percent, reduced personal income tax for the poorest and raised<br />
it by 15 percent for the richest. While more reform is needed in Senegal, the<br />
participatory approach taken –including many rounds of consultation with<br />
representatives from the business community and civil society – has opened<br />
the door for other progressive reforms that can tackle inequality, notably a<br />
review of the mining codes to tackle low royalties paid by mining companies. 401<br />
In 2005, the newly elected government of Uruguay, led by President José<br />
Mújica, set about reforming the country’s regressive tax system. Consumption<br />
taxes were reduced, coverage of personal income taxes was broadened,<br />
corporate income taxes were consolidated, and some taxes were discontinued.<br />
As a result, the tax structure was significantly simplified and tax rates on the<br />
poorest and the middle class were lowered, while the top earners saw their<br />
rates rise. Today, inequality measured in after-tax income is starkly lower. 402<br />
Despite this domestic progress, however, Uruguay remains a global tax haven,<br />
facilitating billions in tax avoidance elsewhere. 403<br />
These reforms show that where there is political will, policies can move in the<br />
right direction, ensuring that those who have more – corporations and rich<br />
individuals – pay more taxes.<br />
International consensus is shifting<br />
In the face of constrained budgets and public outrage, international consensus<br />
is also shifting. Despite the limitations of the BEPS process described above,<br />
the fact that the G8, G20 and OECD took up this agenda in 2013 demonstrates a<br />
clear consensus that corporate taxation is in need of radical reform. The OECD’s<br />
analysis also demonstrates that there is a need to redefine international rules<br />
in order to curb profit-shifting, and to ensure companies pay taxes where<br />
economic activity takes place and value is created. 404<br />
The IMF is also reconsidering how MNCs are taxed, and in a recent report<br />
recognized the need to shift the tax base towards developing countries. 405<br />
They also acknowledged that the ‘fair’ international allocation of tax revenue<br />
and powers across countries is insufficiently addressed by current initiatives.<br />
OECD, USA and EU processes are also making progress on tax transparency<br />
to lift the veil of secrecy that surrounds the global tax system. European<br />
institutions have led the way by adopting a reporting system for European<br />
banks, agreeing that information, such as where they have subsidiaries, how<br />
much profit they make and where they pay taxes, should be public information,<br />
especially after many of these banks were rescued with public money. The<br />
G8 has made progress on registries of beneficial ownership, with some<br />
public registries moving ahead. And a new global standard for the automatic<br />
exchange of tax information has been agreed by the G20.<br />
87