1FW2e8F
1FW2e8F
1FW2e8F
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SECTION 1 2 3 INTRODUCTION<br />
Nthabiseng was born to a poor black family in Limpopo, a rural area in<br />
South Africa. On the same day, Pieter was born nearby in a rich suburb of<br />
Cape Town. Nthabiseng’s mother had no formal schooling and her father<br />
is unemployed, whereas Pieter’s parents both completed university<br />
education at Stellenbosch University and have well-paid jobs.<br />
As a result, Nthabiseng and Pieter’s life chances are vastly different.<br />
Nthabiseng is almost one and a half times as likely to die in the first year<br />
of her life as Pieter. 128 He is likely to live more than 15 years longer than<br />
Nthabiseng. 129<br />
Pieter will complete on average 12 years of schooling and will most<br />
probably go to university, whereas Nthabiseng will be lucky if she<br />
gets one year. 130 Such basics as clean toilets, clean water or decent<br />
healthcare 131 will be out of her reach. If Nthabiseng has children there<br />
is a very high chance they will also grow up equally poor. 132<br />
While Nthabiseng and Pieter do not have any choice about where they<br />
are born, their gender, or the wealth and education of their parents,<br />
governments do have a choice to intervene to even up people’s life<br />
chances. Without deliberate action though, this injustice will be<br />
repeated in countries across the world.<br />
This thought experiment is taken from the World Development Report 2006.<br />
Oxfam has updated the facts on life chances in South Africa. 133<br />
Economic inequality ** – the skewed distribution of income and wealth – has<br />
reached extreme levels and continues to rise. Seven out of 10 people on the<br />
planet now live in a country where economic inequality is worse today than<br />
it was 30 years ago. 136 South Africa, for example, is now significantly more<br />
unequal than it was at the end of Apartheid 20 years ago. 137 This inequality<br />
undermines global efforts to reduce poverty and hurts us all. This report is<br />
focused on the pernicious effects of inequality, and the possible solutions to it.<br />
“<br />
Extreme disparities in<br />
income are slowing the<br />
pace of poverty reduction<br />
and hampering the<br />
development of broad-based<br />
economic growth.<br />
KOFI ANNAN 134<br />
“<br />
“<br />
There’s been class<br />
warfare going on for the<br />
last 20 years and<br />
my class has won.<br />
WARREN BUFFET<br />
THE FOURTH WEALTHIEST<br />
PERSON IN THE WORLD 135<br />
“<br />
Even It Up: Time to End Extreme Inequality starts by showing that the gap<br />
between rich and poor is already very wide and is growing in the majority of<br />
countries. It then demonstrates why extreme economic inequality is bad for all<br />
of us. In more unequal societies, rich and poor alike have shorter lives, and live<br />
with a greater threat of violence and insecurity. Inequality hinders economic<br />
growth and stifles social mobility. It creates conditions in which crime and<br />
corruption thrive. It underlies many of the world’s violent conflicts and is<br />
a barrier in the fight against climate change.<br />
Critically, this report will demonstrate that unless we close the gap between<br />
the haves and the have-nots, we will not win the battle against extreme<br />
** Inequality has many different dimensions, including race, gender, geography and<br />
economy, which rarely work in isolation. This report is primarily concerned with the<br />
concentration of financial resources and wealth in the hands of the few, which can<br />
affect political, social and cultural processes to the detriment of the most vulnerable.<br />
As such, in this report we use the term ‘inequality‘ to refer to extreme economic (wealth<br />
and income) inequality. When referring to the various dimensions of inequality we make<br />
these distinctions.<br />
25