30.01.2015 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7. ROLE OF QTLs IN THE EARLY EVOLUTION...<br />

177<br />

7.3.4. Genomic distribution of QTLs in L. multiflorum and L. perenne<br />

QTLs were located among all linkage groups (Figure 7.6 A-G). Unsurprisingly, a little<br />

more QTLs were detected on longer linkage groups (Table 7.6) than on shorter. The similar<br />

tendency was observed for major QTLs. The mean phenotypic variance explained by all<br />

QTLs located on different linkage groups was very alike. Nevertheless, a QTL size depended<br />

on a linkage group and the biggest QTLs were located on the three longest groups i.e., LG1<br />

(214.2 cM), LG2 (183.7 cM) and LG4 (164.1 cM). In general the mean LOD value was similar<br />

for the majority of linkage groups. The only exceptions were LG3 and LG6 for which mean<br />

LOD values were significantly higher. This result was attributable to QTLs responsible for the<br />

presence of awns and days from spring rush to ear emergence that had extremely high LOD<br />

values. In addition, the QTL for basal leaf length with LOD value equal to 45.5 was detected<br />

on LG3.<br />

Densities of QTLs calculated as a number of QTLs per 1 cM were somehow different on<br />

each linkage group and they were not correlated with LG length. Indeed, the highest density<br />

was exhibited by groups of modest length as LG6 and LG3. Visual inspection of QTLs’ map<br />

positions demonstrated clearly some level of overlapping (Figure 7.6 A-G). A good measure<br />

of overlapping was obtained if the total length of all QTLs on a given linkage group was<br />

divided by the LG length (Figure 7.7). The obtained value that could be described as a coefficient<br />

of overlapping showed the highest number of QTLs occupying the similar position on<br />

LG4. As many as five QTLs shared the same position and this calculation was in agreement<br />

with the visual inspection. Notwithstanding the fact that the lowest overlapping was found<br />

on the shortest linkage group, LG7, no correlation was observed between the linkage group<br />

length and the level of overlapping. Somehow lower overlapping was found for major QTLs<br />

but it simply resulted from fewer major QTLs.<br />

In some cases overlapping QTLs shared exactly the same position concerning flanking<br />

markers and markers linked with them at maximum LOD value. In these cases, it was<br />

reasonable to speculate that overlapping QTLs represented the same genes with pleiotropic<br />

effect. This must have been true for QTLs controlling green and dry weight of tillers on LG2<br />

and LG4, green and dry weight of vegetative part on LG3 and basal leaf width and area on<br />

LG3. In other cases, despite QTLs spanned over the same distance, the linked markers with<br />

the highest LOD value were quite different. Although pleiotropy could not be excluded, the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!