30.01.2015 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. GENETIC DIVERSITY...<br />

57<br />

4.2. MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Twenty five populations of L. multiflorum and L. perenne representing cultivars and wild<br />

ecotypes and two cultivars of L. hybridum were analysed by means of isoenzymes and from<br />

twelve to twenty by different DNA markers. The list of populations and the methods of material<br />

development are presented in Annex 13.1. On average 30 plants from each population<br />

were used in isozyme analysis and 10 plants per a population in DNA analyses. For each<br />

plant about 5-10 g of newly emerged leaves were harvested four weeks after the autumn cut<br />

(i.e., in early October). Then they were packed in labelled bags, placed on ice, transported<br />

to the laboratory and frozen in 30 o C for enzyme and DNA isolation. Since there was no loss<br />

of enzyme activity in frozen plants in comparison with fresh ones, only frozen material was<br />

used in further studies. The enzyme analysis and DNA isolation were carried 1-4 months<br />

after the leaf harvesting.<br />

4.2.1. Isoenzyme analysis<br />

Isozymes were assayed by horizontal starch gel electrophoresis in Lithium borate/Triscitrate<br />

buffer system. Polymorphism was measured at seven enzyme systems: esterases<br />

(EST), fluorescent esterases (EST-flu), aspartate transaminase (AAT), cytosol aminopeptidase<br />

(CAP), NAD-depended malate dehydrogenase (MDH), peroxidases (PER) and superoxide<br />

dismutase (SOD). The methods, buffer recipes and staining procedures were taken<br />

from Zielinski (1987) with own modifications. All procedures and enzyme systems used are<br />

described in Annex 13.3.<br />

Interpretation of zymograms<br />

Due to the lack of knowledge about genetics of all studied isozymes but AAT, all loci<br />

were identified by comparison with a model plant - Hordeum vulgare. The relatively high similarity<br />

between genomes of Poaceae makes possible to use a single species as a model for<br />

the analysis of the others. Therefore, with a broad knowledge about genetics and structure<br />

of the majority of enzymes, relatively close similarity to Lolium and the same chromosome<br />

number (2n=14), barley is a very suitable model in analysis of isozymes in ryegrasses. Later<br />

on the manner of inheritance of all studied isozymes was confirmed in crossing experiments<br />

(Chapter 6).<br />

In the present work the standardised numbering system proposed by Kahler and Allard<br />

(1970) for barley was adopted. Enzyme systems were referred to by upper case letters<br />

according to standard names (e.g., CAP, EST etc.). Specific loci were noted using enzyme<br />

system identification but with lower case letters except for the first one (e.g., Cap1, Est1).<br />

For each locus the bands were labelled according to their distance in mm from the origin.<br />

Subsequent bands were numbered for example, 20, 30, 35 etc. Homozygous genotypes<br />

were thus, labelled 20/20 for example and heterozygous 20/30 for example. Specific alleles<br />

were denoted after hyphen, Cap1-20, Est1-25. This system allows both for easy comparison<br />

between own and literature data and numbering of new alleles. The similar system was also<br />

adopted for AAT, GPI and ACP by Hayward et al. (1995).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!