Untitled
Untitled
Untitled
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4. GENETIC DIVERSITY...<br />
87<br />
netic diversity of L. multiflorum cultivars appears to be related to morphological variation. All<br />
L. multiflorum cultivars analysed here by means of molecular markers are also clearly distinct<br />
from ecotypes by extremely high values for generative traits (Chapter 3). Examination<br />
of cp and mtDNA haplotypes shows that Bartissimo appears to be derived from Variamo<br />
(the same cpDNA and mtDNA), Bartolini from Guliamo whereas a distinct mtDNA haplotype<br />
in Atalja indicates different origin. However, each cultivar has specific haplotypes not present<br />
in the other Lolium in addition to significantly higher frequency of several RAPD bands<br />
(e.g., OPA02-4). Based on their morphological performance the introgressions from the other<br />
closely related species e.g., from the genus Festuca is proposed (Chapter 3). The molecular<br />
data seems to support this hypothesis. However, it must be emphasized that these interpretations<br />
are preliminary and further organelle DNA data based on a wider primer and species<br />
(e.g., Festuca) choice, will be needed to build up a definitive picture.<br />
4.4.3. Phylogenetic relationships between L. multiflorum and L. perenne<br />
The most striking results to emerge from the present work are high genetic similarities<br />
between L. multiflorum and L. perenne more typically associated with conspecific populations.<br />
Huge genetic identities are apparent in nuclear, chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes<br />
(I ranged from 0.986 to 0.887). This is not unexpected because the high level of similarity<br />
has been observed by the other authors as well (Bulińska-Radomska and Lester 1985; Loos<br />
1993b; Bennett et al. 2002). However, most of these data were obtained by enzyme electrophoresis<br />
and the authors believed that due to low resolution it would not be possible to make<br />
more precise picture until advanced DNA methods would be available for forage grasses<br />
(Charmet and Balfourier 1994). Although several DNA-based comparisons have been done<br />
for Italian and perennial ryegrass (Stammers et al. 1995; Zielinski et al. 1997; Balfourier et al.<br />
2000) none of these research are comparable with the present work both with reference to<br />
the diversity of markers applied and plant material including cultivars and wild ecotypes. Another<br />
important point to notice is the approach in which the same plant individuals have been<br />
examined by all marker categories. This enables to compare the results obtained with different<br />
methods on the same plant material. And the results are clear - the enzymatic data have<br />
not been cheating - high similarity is observed at the DNA level irrespective of the marker<br />
type used. Moreover, the gene identities obtained by different methods are very alike. Even<br />
values based on insertional polymorphism that is thought to be highly differentiating, are well<br />
ahead those for different species confirming the extensive gene flow between both species.<br />
Considerations about the meaning of high similarity between L. multiflorum and L. perenne<br />
inevitable give rise to the question how much genetic exchange disqualifies populations<br />
from status as separate biological species. Biological species concept (BSC) perceives<br />
species as populations between which the gene exchange is limited or prevented by reproductive<br />
isolating mechanisms (Avise 2004). One difficulty of BSC involves the primacy of<br />
reproductive barrier in demarcating species and thus, no arbitrary magnitude of molecular<br />
genetic divergence can provide infallible metric to establish specific status. How, then, can<br />
the molecular data inform about speciation of ryegrasses<br />
One possibility is the estimation of genetic identity. The concept of genetic identity/distance<br />
is fundamental to evolutionary studies. A genetic identity (I) between two sequences,