30.01.2015 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. GENETIC DIVERSITY...<br />

87<br />

netic diversity of L. multiflorum cultivars appears to be related to morphological variation. All<br />

L. multiflorum cultivars analysed here by means of molecular markers are also clearly distinct<br />

from ecotypes by extremely high values for generative traits (Chapter 3). Examination<br />

of cp and mtDNA haplotypes shows that Bartissimo appears to be derived from Variamo<br />

(the same cpDNA and mtDNA), Bartolini from Guliamo whereas a distinct mtDNA haplotype<br />

in Atalja indicates different origin. However, each cultivar has specific haplotypes not present<br />

in the other Lolium in addition to significantly higher frequency of several RAPD bands<br />

(e.g., OPA02-4). Based on their morphological performance the introgressions from the other<br />

closely related species e.g., from the genus Festuca is proposed (Chapter 3). The molecular<br />

data seems to support this hypothesis. However, it must be emphasized that these interpretations<br />

are preliminary and further organelle DNA data based on a wider primer and species<br />

(e.g., Festuca) choice, will be needed to build up a definitive picture.<br />

4.4.3. Phylogenetic relationships between L. multiflorum and L. perenne<br />

The most striking results to emerge from the present work are high genetic similarities<br />

between L. multiflorum and L. perenne more typically associated with conspecific populations.<br />

Huge genetic identities are apparent in nuclear, chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes<br />

(I ranged from 0.986 to 0.887). This is not unexpected because the high level of similarity<br />

has been observed by the other authors as well (Bulińska-Radomska and Lester 1985; Loos<br />

1993b; Bennett et al. 2002). However, most of these data were obtained by enzyme electrophoresis<br />

and the authors believed that due to low resolution it would not be possible to make<br />

more precise picture until advanced DNA methods would be available for forage grasses<br />

(Charmet and Balfourier 1994). Although several DNA-based comparisons have been done<br />

for Italian and perennial ryegrass (Stammers et al. 1995; Zielinski et al. 1997; Balfourier et al.<br />

2000) none of these research are comparable with the present work both with reference to<br />

the diversity of markers applied and plant material including cultivars and wild ecotypes. Another<br />

important point to notice is the approach in which the same plant individuals have been<br />

examined by all marker categories. This enables to compare the results obtained with different<br />

methods on the same plant material. And the results are clear - the enzymatic data have<br />

not been cheating - high similarity is observed at the DNA level irrespective of the marker<br />

type used. Moreover, the gene identities obtained by different methods are very alike. Even<br />

values based on insertional polymorphism that is thought to be highly differentiating, are well<br />

ahead those for different species confirming the extensive gene flow between both species.<br />

Considerations about the meaning of high similarity between L. multiflorum and L. perenne<br />

inevitable give rise to the question how much genetic exchange disqualifies populations<br />

from status as separate biological species. Biological species concept (BSC) perceives<br />

species as populations between which the gene exchange is limited or prevented by reproductive<br />

isolating mechanisms (Avise 2004). One difficulty of BSC involves the primacy of<br />

reproductive barrier in demarcating species and thus, no arbitrary magnitude of molecular<br />

genetic divergence can provide infallible metric to establish specific status. How, then, can<br />

the molecular data inform about speciation of ryegrasses<br />

One possibility is the estimation of genetic identity. The concept of genetic identity/distance<br />

is fundamental to evolutionary studies. A genetic identity (I) between two sequences,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!