30.01.2015 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

214<br />

8. MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY OF THE GENUS LOLIUM<br />

F. pratensis is the most prominent diploid representative, as the most common ancestor of<br />

the genus Lolium. Moreover, Micropyropsis is considered to be in between owing to a subracemose<br />

inflorescence, an intermediate trait between the paniculate of Schedonorus and<br />

the reduced spike of Lolium. What is more, the difficulties in the separation of the genus<br />

Lolium into two clades according to the mode of reproduction can be a further support of this<br />

hypothesis.<br />

8.4.2. Division of the genus Lolium into two groups – auto- and allogamous species<br />

The division of the genus Lolium into two sections in accordance with the mode of<br />

reproduction has long been postulated (Terrell 1968). The first section consists from<br />

strict annuals, self-pollinated species, L. loliaceum, L. remotum, L. temulentum and<br />

L. persicum, whereas out-pollinated L. perenne ssp. multiflorum, L. perenne ssp. perenne<br />

and L. rigidum belong to the second section (Jenkin 1959). The above classification has been<br />

confirmed in the majority of morphological and enzymatic studies (Loos 1993b; Charmet and<br />

Balfourier 1994; Bennet et al. 2002). Molecular approaches employed in the present work<br />

are in general agreement with the above picture. The genus can readily be divided into two<br />

clades corresponding to whether the plants are autogamous or allogamous.<br />

The first clade consists of three species, L. persicum, L. remotum and L. temulentum<br />

that are self-fertile annuals, known only as weeds of cultivated crops. They possess unique<br />

mtDNA haplotypes and a little different ITS region as demonstrated by the restriction digestions<br />

of the LOLITS. Similarly to the other Loliums they have pollen allergen genes. Nevertheless,<br />

the mean number of nucleotide substitutions differentiating their allergen encoding<br />

genes from those observed in out-pollinated species is high and ranges from 0.237 to 0.255.<br />

The low average genetic similarity between autogamous and allogamous species (I=0.398)<br />

indicates a quite remote split between them. The second clade includes L. perenne ssp.<br />

multiflorum, L. perenne ssp. perenne and L. rigidum that are wind-pollinated annuals, biennials<br />

or perennials. They are easy to separate from all self-pollinated species due to different<br />

morphology and DNA fingerprints revealed by the majority of DNA markers.<br />

Nonetheless, the position of the fourth autogamous species, L. loliaceum is contradictory<br />

with the current taxonomic classification according to which, the species should be<br />

included in a single clade with L. persicum, L. temulentum and L. remotum. Conversely,<br />

it consequently groups within out-pollinated taxa, in close proximity to multiflorum or<br />

L. rigidum, yet being distinct from them. Similarly, less nucleotides are different when restriction<br />

sites in L. loliaceum genes, both mitochondrial and allergen genes are compared<br />

with out-pollinated species than if such comparisons are made between L. loliaceum and<br />

self-pollinated taxa. The data from morpho-logical and isozyme analyses seem to confirm<br />

the close relationships of L. loliaceum with outbreeders. Morphologically, it is in somehow<br />

isolated position, more closely related to L. rigidum (Loos 1993a). Terrel (1968) interprets<br />

L. loliaceum as an offshoot of L. rigidum. Isozymes place it together with multiflorum and<br />

L. rigidum (Charmet and Balfourier 1994). The ability to separate L. loliaceum from the rest of<br />

inbreeding species based on isozymes confirms its distinctiveness. Note, the other autogamous<br />

species are unrecognisable at enzymatic level (Loos 1993b). Unfortunately, attempts<br />

to clarify the evolution of L. loliaceum based on DNA data have been hampered by the fact

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!