31.01.2015 Views

gas hydrate - CCOP

gas hydrate - CCOP

gas hydrate - CCOP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The results of studies made on 11 coal core samples from the two observation wells and 13<br />

coal core samples from the production well indicated that the desorption of <strong>gas</strong> averaged<br />

about 0.2-0.31 cubic centimeter per gram or 7.2-10.95 cubic foot per ton.<br />

The properties of the <strong>gas</strong>es were determined by collecting them in 10 canisters from both<br />

production and observation wells and analyzing using <strong>gas</strong> chromatographic techniques. The<br />

composition of the total <strong>gas</strong> released from the coal is as follows:<br />

Methane <strong>gas</strong> about 60%<br />

Nitrogen about 28%<br />

Carbon Dioxide about 12%<br />

Gas flow rate<br />

Gas flow rate from the production well was analyzed using a well stimulation technique by<br />

pumping water from the coal beds to allow coalbed <strong>gas</strong>es to flow into the well. The following<br />

procedure was used:<br />

A submersible pump was installed in the production well below the lower coal seam. The<br />

installation depth was 311.0 m including the length of the pump. The lower coal seam is<br />

found from 281.0 - 287.0 m depth. A pumping test was commenced by pumping water out of<br />

the well. Flow rate was measured and at the same time water levels in both production and<br />

observation wells were recorded. The data received were used for preliminary determination<br />

of coal permeability. Water was continuously pumped so as to keep the water level below the<br />

level of the coal seam. Pumping was suspended at predetermined time-intervals while the<br />

water level was always kept below the coal seam. Gas flow is measured by a system of <strong>gas</strong><br />

flow meters.<br />

The results of well stimulation reveal that the water flow rate from the coal seam into the well<br />

was approximately 1.0 cubic meter per day or 0.04 cubic meters per hour. This water flow rate<br />

is considered to be very low, yielding a positive effect during the <strong>gas</strong> production.<br />

The <strong>gas</strong> flow during the first 10 days was measured at 19 liters. The resulting flow rate is 1.9<br />

liters per day or 0.067 liters per hour which is considered to be very low. The pumping test<br />

data were used to calculate the coal permeability by a hydrogeological technique yielding a<br />

result of 5 x 10 -6 cm per second. The pumping test was continued for 45 days and it was found<br />

that after the first 10 days the <strong>gas</strong> flow had completely ceased. The reasons may be due to the<br />

low permeability of the coal and clogging by bentonite mud.<br />

Estimation of reserves of coal and coalbed methane<br />

The reserve estimation of coal in the Mae La Mao basin employed the circular method<br />

recommended by USGS (USGS Circular 891). Using the grid reference of the well as the<br />

center, circles with radii of 400, 1,200, and 4,800 m respectively are drawn to delimit the<br />

reserve areas. The coal reserves are then calculated as measured coal, indicated coal, and<br />

inferred coal respectively.<br />

The thickness of coal used in the reserve calculation is derived from an isopach map by<br />

integrating the entire thickness of all coal beds. In the current calculation, the total thickness<br />

of coal beds is the sum of the upper and lower beds.<br />

140 New Energy Resources in the <strong>CCOP</strong> Region - Gas Hydrates and Coalbed Methane

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!