31.01.2015 Views

gas hydrate - CCOP

gas hydrate - CCOP

gas hydrate - CCOP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTRODUCTION<br />

Clathrate <strong>hydrate</strong>s are solid crystalline compounds that form when water (host molecule)<br />

under low temperatures and high pressures is exposed to small molecules (guest molecule),<br />

such as methane (CH 4 ), ethane (C 2 H 6 ), hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), and carbon dioxide (CO 2 )<br />

(Englezos, 1993; and Sloan 1998). Geologic deposits of <strong>gas</strong> <strong>hydrate</strong>s mainly have methane<br />

guests and occur in settings where the necessary low temperatures and high pressures exist for<br />

<strong>gas</strong> <strong>hydrate</strong> formation and stability; on-shore beneath the permafrost, and off-shore in deep<br />

ocean sediments. Kvenvolden (1993) estimates the amount of methane in geologic deposits at<br />

1015 m 3 , which equals a carbon mass that exceeds all conventional fossil energy reserves by a<br />

factor of two.<br />

Almost without exception, <strong>gas</strong> <strong>hydrate</strong>s crystallize into three types of structures depending on<br />

the guest molecules; sI, sII, or sH. The sI and sII structures were identified via Xray<br />

diffraction by von Stackelberg and Müller (1954), and 33 years later Ripmeester et al. (1987)<br />

proposed the sH <strong>hydrate</strong> structure. The sI and sII structures have both small and large cavities<br />

for the guest molecules and the sH structure has small, medium, and large cavities. Naturally<br />

occurring <strong>gas</strong> <strong>hydrate</strong>s generally have guest molecules that are hydrophobic, such as CH 4 .<br />

Gas <strong>hydrate</strong>s of H 2 S and CO 2 , however, are water soluble acid <strong>gas</strong>es, as classified by Jeffery<br />

(1984). Although chemically quite different, CH 4 and CO 2 form sI structures as simple<br />

<strong>hydrate</strong>s, occupying both the small and large cavities of the sI structure.<br />

Conventional production methods for methane <strong>hydrate</strong>s in geologic formations involve<br />

dissociating the <strong>gas</strong> <strong>hydrate</strong> by altering the system conditions to a point outside the stability<br />

region, producing CH 4 <strong>gas</strong> and water. Gas <strong>hydrate</strong> production via thermal stimulation<br />

involves adding heat to the geologic formation, which initially raises the formation<br />

temperature outside the stability region, causing the <strong>gas</strong> <strong>hydrate</strong> to dissociate. Once the<br />

dissociation process is underway, added heat is used to overcome the endothermic heat of<br />

dissociation. Production via depressurization typically involves reducing the system pressure,<br />

causing dissociation of the <strong>gas</strong> <strong>hydrate</strong>. However, the endothermic heat of dissociation<br />

decreases the reservoir temperature, which may reduce <strong>gas</strong> production rates or halt production<br />

if water ice forms and reduces formation permeability. The third conventional production<br />

approach involves injecting an inhibitor into the reservoir, which effectively shifts the <strong>gas</strong><br />

<strong>hydrate</strong> equilibrium curve, causing dissociation. As with depressurization, the endothermic<br />

heat of dissociation decreases the reservoir temperature, lowering or halting <strong>gas</strong> production.<br />

An unconventional method that has been discussed for <strong>gas</strong> <strong>hydrate</strong> production involves the<br />

injection of CO 2 . The idea of swapping CO 2 for CH 4 in <strong>gas</strong> <strong>hydrate</strong>s was first advanced by<br />

Ohgaki et al. (1996) and then for ethane <strong>hydrate</strong> by Nakano et al. (1998). Their concept<br />

involves injecting CO 2 <strong>gas</strong>, which is then allowed to equilibrate with methane <strong>hydrate</strong> along<br />

the three-phase equilibrium boundary (Smith et al., 2001). Because of the difference in<br />

chemical affinity for CO 2 versus methane in the sI <strong>hydrate</strong> structure, the mole fraction of<br />

methane would be reduced to approximately 0.48 in the <strong>hydrate</strong> and rise to a value of 0.7 in<br />

the <strong>gas</strong> phase at equilibrium. McGrail et al. (2004) have proposed a more advanced concept<br />

involving injection of a microemulsion of liquid CO 2 and water into the <strong>gas</strong> <strong>hydrate</strong> formation.<br />

This approach is intended to provide additional sensible heat in the emulsion and heat of<br />

formation of the CO 2 <strong>hydrate</strong> as a low grade heat source for further dissociation of methane<br />

<strong>hydrate</strong> away from the injectate plume, which has been reported to enhance production rates<br />

by as much as a factor of 30. The additional benefits of this approach include 1) <strong>gas</strong> <strong>hydrate</strong><br />

remains in the pore space during production thus maintaining mechanical stability of the<br />

78<br />

New Energy Resources in the <strong>CCOP</strong> Region - Gas Hydrates and Coalbed Methane

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!