03.02.2015 Views

AN AUGURY OF REVOLUTION: THE IRANIAN STUDENT ...

AN AUGURY OF REVOLUTION: THE IRANIAN STUDENT ...

AN AUGURY OF REVOLUTION: THE IRANIAN STUDENT ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

For the rest of the shah’s rule, decisions regarding the acquisition of military equipment were<br />

essentially left up to the Iranian government. 485<br />

The ISAUS realized the importance of the trip when they noted that “A decision by<br />

President Nixon in 1972 allowed the Shah to buy virtually any weapons he wanted.” 486 The<br />

ISAUS also recognized that as a result of this agreement, “The Iranian economy was soon<br />

flooded with American capital, the military with American guns, planes, and bombs, and<br />

American capitalists’ pockets were soon bulging at the seams with Iranian oil profits.” 487 The<br />

agreement reached between Nixon and the shah on 30 May 1972 solidified the role that Iran<br />

played in the Twin Pillars policy that had been conceived in the final year of the Johnson<br />

administration, further developed with the Nixon Doctrine, and finalized in Tehran in May 1972.<br />

In the eyes of the Nixon administration, if peace and stability along with Western interests in the<br />

Persian Gulf were to be maintained, the “principal burden must fall on Iran.” 488<br />

Protests occurred in the United States and Iran as a result of the stop in Tehran. ISA<br />

spokesman Fahad Bibak reported that the CISNU “initiated the call for May 30 protest actions to<br />

coincide with Nixon’s arrival in Iran.” 489<br />

Protests were arranged in Washington, Chicago, and<br />

San Francisco. The Washington-Baltimore area ISA organized a demonstration that consisted of<br />

more than one hundred participants in the nation’s capital. The demonstrators shouted chants<br />

that included “U.S. get out of Iran, U.S. get out of Vietnam.” 490 An ISA statement argued that<br />

“The present trip is to consolidate the ‘Nixon Doctrine’ in Iran. Despite its failure in Vietnam,<br />

485 “Follow-Up on the President’s Talk with the Shah of Iran,” DNSA, Iran Revolution, 25 July 1972, Secret,<br />

Memorandum from Henry Kissinger to the Secretaries of State and Defense, IR00782.<br />

486 ISAUS, On the Violation of Human Rights in Iran, 23.<br />

487 CISNU, Iranian Peoples’ Movement, 1953-1973, Iran Report, no. 2, June 1974, 2.<br />

488 AE Iran to Sisco, “Charges by Former Iranian Student Daryani that US Agencies Working Against Iran,” 17 June<br />

1971, 1230Z, FRUS 1969-1976, Vol. E-4, http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ho/frus/ (accessed on 26 February 2008).<br />

489 Vinnie Longo, “March Protests Nixon-Shah Meeting,” The Militant, Vol. 36, No. 22 (9 June 1972), 4.<br />

490 Longo, “March Protests Nixon-Shah Meeting,” 4.<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!