03.02.2015 Views

AN AUGURY OF REVOLUTION: THE IRANIAN STUDENT ...

AN AUGURY OF REVOLUTION: THE IRANIAN STUDENT ...

AN AUGURY OF REVOLUTION: THE IRANIAN STUDENT ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

further radicalized the opposition. Towards the end of Johnson’s administration, the blueprint<br />

for American foreign policy regarding Iran was written. Every decision regarding U.S. – Iranian<br />

relations from that point forward reinforced the widespread notion among Iranian students<br />

abroad and large segments of the Iranian population at home that the shah was a puppet of<br />

Western imperialism. Even as Iranian students were joined by the global student movement of<br />

the late 1960s, and their activities reached a fever pitch by the 1970s, Washington further<br />

entrenched itself with the shah. As students became a major factor in revolutionary activity,<br />

American policymakers could only speculate whether they would have had better fortunes if they<br />

heeded the calls of secular nationalists during the previous decade. As the U.S. government<br />

recognized, Iranian students abroad were a conglomeration of discontented Iranian citizens who<br />

were united in their hatred for the shah. During the 1960s their numbers grew, and by the 1970s,<br />

as less wealthy Iranians began to study abroad in larger numbers, they represented a microcosm<br />

of Iranian society that eventually toppled the shah’s regime. Students abroad were also one of<br />

the only outlets for political dissent by Iranians, because of the severe political oppression inside<br />

of Iran. However, the United States made the same mistake that the shah did in believing that<br />

student discontent was only present in “a small handful of foreign-inspired troublemakers.” 549<br />

This belief contributed to twenty-five years of U.S. support for the shah’s regime which had<br />

extreme repercussions for American foreign policy, the politics of Iran, and for Iranian students<br />

abroad. Contrary to the beliefs of the shah and policymakers in Washington, the Iranian student<br />

movement was very large and influential. Piedar noted, “most of the revolutionary cadres from<br />

the 1950s through the 1970s had risen from this very movement.” 550<br />

549 Parsons, The Pride and the Fall: Iran 1974-1979, 34.<br />

550 “Interview with Payman Piedar,” http://www.nefac.net/node/1731 (accessed on 1 August 2008).<br />

131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!