03.02.2015 Views

AN AUGURY OF REVOLUTION: THE IRANIAN STUDENT ...

AN AUGURY OF REVOLUTION: THE IRANIAN STUDENT ...

AN AUGURY OF REVOLUTION: THE IRANIAN STUDENT ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

was dubious of the secular nature of the group. 286<br />

However, pragmatism led Khomeini to<br />

instruct his followers to cooperate with secular leftists in the 1960s. 287 While this relationship<br />

was tenuous, it represented the variety of groups that held the common interest in their hatred of<br />

the shah. While the shah’s plans for modernization alienated the traditional and religious groups<br />

of society, his lack of political freedoms infuriated newly emerging groups and classes, such as<br />

the growing number of students and university educated Iranians. 288 The impact of the shah’s<br />

rule could clearly be seen on the Iranian student movement of the 1960s.<br />

Both secular leftists and Islamists offered an alternate political discourse for the future of<br />

Iran. While they often cooperated in order to form a broad anti-shah coalition, these diverging<br />

ideologies played a major role in the splits that eventually occurred in the CISNU. This uneasy<br />

tension can be seen in the relationship between Qotbzadeh and Fatemi. Early on, even as there<br />

was solidarity between the two while they fought deportation during their days in leadership of<br />

the ISAUS, tension grew between them. “As much as he loved Sadegh for his intelligence and<br />

commitment, Fatemi grew wary of Sadegh and his politics of Islam,” and this forced them to<br />

drift apart. 289 The treatment of the clergy in Iran further radicalized Iranian students, and<br />

Islamists such as Qotbzadeh began to form their own groups. However, while Islamists and<br />

secularists drifted apart, there was not full-blown animosity between the groups in the mid-<br />

1960s.<br />

While the shah acted forcefully against any opposition in Iran, anti-shah demonstrations<br />

continued throughout the United States. By the autumn of 1965, the shah was still aggravated by<br />

the reluctance of the U.S. government to do anything about their behavior. His concern with<br />

286 Matin-asgari, Iranian Student Opposition to the Shah, 72-3, 85.<br />

287 Hoveyda, The Shah and the Ayatollah, 27.<br />

288 For a discussion on social classes in Iran refer to Keddie, Modern Iran: Roots and Results of Revolution.<br />

289 Jerome, The Man in the Mirror, 57.<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!