03.02.2015 Views

AN AUGURY OF REVOLUTION: THE IRANIAN STUDENT ...

AN AUGURY OF REVOLUTION: THE IRANIAN STUDENT ...

AN AUGURY OF REVOLUTION: THE IRANIAN STUDENT ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Even though Jimmy Carter used human rights as a platform in the 1976 election and it<br />

was central to thinking, Iran seemed to be treated differently than other nations because of their<br />

vital strategic and economic importance. The ISAUS believed that Carter’s human rights policy<br />

was “nothing but a mirage, camouflaged to fool our people…” 508<br />

The Carter administration<br />

reaffirmed “support for a strong Iran, noting that Iran’s security is a matter of the highest priority<br />

for this country.” 509 The reality of Carter’s Iran policy led the ISAUS to believe that “The main<br />

thrust of Carter’s international policy as it regards Iran is to preserve U.S. imperialist domination<br />

over Iran and the Persian Gulf.” 510 While approximately two hundred Iranian students protested<br />

outside the White House in Washington on 31 December 1977, Jimmy Carter was spending his<br />

New Year’s Eve in Tehran where he toasted the shah by reiterating Kissinger’s belief that Iran<br />

was an “island of stability in one of the more troubled areas of the world.” 511<br />

By 1977, the inertia of the policy that began around 1967 was too much to stop. William<br />

Stueck noted that “In most government settings, short of a disastrous turn of events or<br />

overwhelming evidence of such a turn on the horizon, policymakers tend to hold rather than alter<br />

established policy.” 512<br />

Jimmy Carter and his predecessors missed the overwhelming evidence<br />

that Iranian students abroad provided them. William Sullivan, referring to some of the younger<br />

members of Congress, said that “They were more closely attuned to the younger generation,<br />

which reflected the dissidence of Iranian students and their American sympathizers.” 513 These<br />

younger congressmen warned Sullivan and other American politicians and diplomats of the<br />

508 ISAUS, U.S. Involvement in Iran, Part 1, 77.<br />

509 “Shah, Shifting Stand, Pledges to Oppose Increase in Oil Price, He Offers to Give U.S. ‘A Break,’ Iran’s Ruler<br />

Makes Promise After two days of Talks with Carter – Invites More Western Goods,” NYT, 17 November 1977, p. 1.<br />

510 ISAUS, Condemn Shah’s U.S. Visit, 3-4.<br />

511 Jimmy Carter, Keeping Faith: Memoirs of a President (New York: Bantam Books, 1982), 437; “Iranians Protest<br />

at White House Against Carter’s Visit to Iran, NYT, 1 January 1978, p. 12.<br />

512 William Stueck, Rethinking the Korean War: A New Diplomatic and Strategic History (Princeton University<br />

Press, 2002), 115.<br />

513 Sullivan, Mission to Iran, 32.<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!