03.02.2015 Views

AN AUGURY OF REVOLUTION: THE IRANIAN STUDENT ...

AN AUGURY OF REVOLUTION: THE IRANIAN STUDENT ...

AN AUGURY OF REVOLUTION: THE IRANIAN STUDENT ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The shah saw Iranian students abroad as a growing threat to his throne; indeed the voices of the<br />

students grew louder. The Johnson administration saw the students’ behavior as a liability to the<br />

improvement of relations between the shah and Washington. By the end of the decade, the Six<br />

Day War, the Vietnam War, and British withdrawal from the Persian Gulf had begun to greatly<br />

influence Johnson’s foreign policy with Iran.<br />

By 1964, the Iranian intelligentsia at home and abroad presented serious challenges for<br />

policymakers in Washington. 194<br />

Students were the most effective revolutionary element of the<br />

Iranian intelligentsia, and they were emphasized in U.S. government reports because they<br />

represented various social backgrounds and demonstrated “the most acute form of disaffection<br />

from the regime in Iran.” 195 Also, there was an “exceedingly widespread” number of anti-regime<br />

Iranian students in the United States. 196 Politically active members of the intelligentsia were not<br />

given a chance to play a role in the shah’s government. In late 1963 “one of the most exciting<br />

political problems of Iran today is how to bring younger elements of the intelligentsia into closer<br />

harmony with the regime.” 197 The Iranian “angry young man” was the product of vast separation<br />

between his ideals and aspirations, and the actual reality of Iranian life. 198 For the Johnson<br />

administration, the activities of anti-shah Iranian students in the United States escalated and<br />

became a “source of serious friction between the United States and Iran.” 199 Therefore, the State<br />

Administration, the Shah of Iran, and the Changing Pattern of U.S. – Iranian Relations, 1965 – 1967, ‘Tired of Being<br />

Treated like a Schoolboy,’” Journal of Cold War Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2 (Spring 2007), 83.<br />

194 The United States government defined intelligentsia as “persons who have influence on the minds of other people<br />

because of the quality of their own minds, usually as the result of higher education.” Refer to “The Iranian<br />

Intellectual Community,” DNSA, 21 December 1963.<br />

195 “The Iranian Intellectual Community,” DNSA, 21 December 1963.<br />

196 “The Iranian Intellectual Community,” DNSA, 21 December 1963.<br />

197 “The Iranian Intellectual Community,” DNSA, 21 December 1963.<br />

198 “The Iranian Intellectual Community,” DNSA, 21 December 1963.<br />

199 Talbot to Harriman, “Request that you ask the Attorney General to begin Deportation Proceedings against an<br />

Anti-Regime Iranian Leader in the United States, 13 May 1964, FRUS 1964-1968, Vol. XXII, 38.<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!