23.03.2015 Views

Legal Rights of Children with Epilepsy in School & Child Care

Legal Rights of Children with Epilepsy in School & Child Care

Legal Rights of Children with Epilepsy in School & Child Care

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER FIVE<br />

Special Education and Section 504<br />

5.1Q: What are the rights <strong>of</strong> school-age students under Section 504?<br />

A: Section 504 prohibits discrim<strong>in</strong>ation aga<strong>in</strong>st a “qualified <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>with</strong> a<br />

disability.” 29 U.S.C. 794. A school-age student who is covered by Section 504<br />

has the right to a free appropriate public education, regardless <strong>of</strong> the nature or<br />

severity <strong>of</strong> his or her disability. The student may receive regular or special<br />

education, which must <strong>in</strong>clude related aids and services that are designed to<br />

meet his or her <strong>in</strong>dividual needs to the same extent as the needs <strong>of</strong> people<br />

<strong>with</strong>out disabilities are met. Additionally, Section 504 requires compliance <strong>with</strong><br />

certa<strong>in</strong> procedural requirements. Section 504 applies to federally conducted and<br />

federally funded programs and activities. With respect to educational programs,<br />

Section 504 applies to preschool, elementary, secondary and adult education<br />

programs and activities. 34 C.F.R. 104.33.<br />

A person is considered a “qualified person <strong>with</strong> a disability” <strong>with</strong> respect to<br />

educational services if he or she is <strong>of</strong> an age dur<strong>in</strong>g which people <strong>with</strong>out<br />

disabilities are provided <strong>with</strong> education services, <strong>of</strong> an age dur<strong>in</strong>g which state<br />

law mandates that people <strong>with</strong> disabilities be provided <strong>with</strong> education services,<br />

or if he or she is a person to whom a state is required to provide services under<br />

the IDEA. 34 C.F.R. 104.3(l)(2).<br />

5.2Q: Are students <strong>with</strong> epilepsy automatically covered under Section 504?<br />

A: No. In order to be covered by Section 504, a student’s epilepsy must<br />

substantially limit one or more <strong>of</strong> his or her major life activities, the student<br />

must have a record <strong>of</strong> such a condition, or the student must be regarded as<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g such a condition. For example, if a student who has epilepsy takes<br />

medication, but he or she still has several breakthrough seizures a week and<br />

experiences side effects from the medication, such as sleep<strong>in</strong>ess, that affect his<br />

or ability to concentrate <strong>in</strong> school and to complete all work on time, he or she<br />

will be protected by Section 504, because the major life activity <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

substantially limited by his or her epilepsy. On the other hand, if a student has<br />

epilepsy that is completely controlled by medication and he or she is able to<br />

participate fully <strong>in</strong> school <strong>with</strong>out any difficulties, he or she may not be<br />

considered to have a disability under the def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>in</strong> Section 504. 40<br />

40 In 1999, the United States Supreme Court issued Sutton v. United Air L<strong>in</strong>es, Inc. 527 U.S. 471 (1999), an<br />

employment case under the Americans <strong>with</strong> Disabilities Act (ADA), which curtailed the scope <strong>of</strong><br />

protection under the ADA and Section 504 (which is <strong>in</strong>terpreted <strong>in</strong> the same manner as the ADA) for<br />

people <strong>with</strong> so-called “correctable” conditions such as epilepsy and diabetes. In this case, the Supreme<br />

Court made it clear that, <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g whether a condition is substantially limit<strong>in</strong>g, the effects, both<br />

negative and positive, <strong>of</strong> mitigat<strong>in</strong>g measures, such as medication, must be considered.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!