31.03.2015 Views

East Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy 2005/06

East Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy 2005/06

East Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy 2005/06

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Midlands</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> Annual Monitoring Report <strong>2005</strong>/<strong>06</strong><br />

Data Analysis<br />

7.8 The <strong>East</strong> <strong>Midlands</strong>, along with the South West,<br />

had the highest growth in traffic with an increase of<br />

21% on major roads between 1995 and <strong>2005</strong>. The<br />

number of vehicle kilometres travelled in the <strong>East</strong><br />

<strong>Midlands</strong> in <strong>2005</strong> was 40,633 million compared to<br />

38,075 million in 2001. The <strong>2005</strong> figure represents a<br />

slight decrease on the 2004 figure of 40,654 million<br />

kilometres. The distribution across different types of<br />

road is shown in Table 7.1<br />

7.9 Although now classified as a significant effects<br />

indicator, there are still difficulties in measuring<br />

congestion, in particular identifying some average<br />

congestion figure for the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Midlands</strong> as a whole.<br />

Congestion is by its nature localised either in urban<br />

areas, or more particularly on roads in urban areas, or<br />

on major roads. While it is desirable and feasible to<br />

establish that congestion occurs on particular routes<br />

and at particular times this tends to be a local issue<br />

(covered in local transport plans) and is either due to<br />

volume of traffic, a pinch point, road works or an<br />

accident.<br />

7.10 A measure of congestion that has been used is<br />

average journey time per person mile related to the<br />

change in travel expressed in person miles.<br />

Nottingham City and Leicester City, along with other<br />

large English conurbations, have contributed to the<br />

formulation of this indicator for urban congestion<br />

(LTP7). However the indicator will be surrounded by<br />

a basket of other indicators as background<br />

information, such as area wide network speeds,<br />

occupancy or bus mode share on the targeted<br />

routes, area wide traffic (LTP2) and changes in peak<br />

period traffic flows to the City Centre (LTP6).The DfT<br />

has commissioned ITIS to help survey flows of traffic.<br />

7.11 In the 2004/05 monitoring report a comparison<br />

was made of the traffic speeds at peak and off peak<br />

periods (the expectation being that peak periods<br />

have increased traffic flow and hence greater<br />

possibilities of congestion). There was little<br />

difference in the speed of traffic on <strong>East</strong> Midland’s<br />

trunk roads between peak and off peak periods.<br />

Policy Commentary<br />

7.12 As part of the work to accommodate the Milton<br />

Keynes & South <strong>Midlands</strong> (MKSM) growth agenda,<br />

Northamptonshire County Council and the Highways<br />

Agency have been working with North Northants<br />

Development Company, Communities and Local<br />

Government and DfT to come up with innovative<br />

measures to remove local traffic from the A14 around<br />

Kettering.This includes proposals for challenging<br />

levels of modal shift and demand management.<br />

7.13 The local authorities in and around the Three<br />

Cities sub area (Nottingham, Leicester and Derby)<br />

have been allocated £1.8 million for an in-depth<br />

investigation of the possible options for tackling<br />

traffic problems and improving roads and public<br />

transport.The funds will be used to consider the<br />

potential for possible road pricing schemes and<br />

other transport options to reduce congestion.<br />

7.14 The proposals for significant growth within the<br />

<strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> can be expected to lead to<br />

significant additional travel. Finding a way to<br />

minimise the effect of such development on traffic<br />

levels presents a major challenge and one which will<br />

benefit from a greater awareness and understanding<br />

of the interrelation between the location,<br />

composition and layout of development, changes to<br />

the road network and the need for significant<br />

improvements to public transport, walking and<br />

cycling. Developments over the last decade or so<br />

have tended to be very reliant on the private car and<br />

have generated many additional car journeys. New<br />

development proposals will have to adopt a<br />

significantly different approach if the goal of a<br />

reduction in traffic growth is to be achieved.<br />

Policy 45: Behavioural Change<br />

The <strong>Regional</strong> Planning Body, public and local<br />

bodies and service providers should work<br />

together to encourage a reduction in the need to<br />

travel and to change public attitudes towards car<br />

usage and public transport. Measures should<br />

include:<br />

• workplace and school travel plans<br />

• quality public transport partnerships<br />

• travel awareness programmes<br />

• educational programmes<br />

• pilot programmes promoting innovations in<br />

teleworking and personalised travel plans<br />

120

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!