31.03.2015 Views

East Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy 2005/06

East Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy 2005/06

East Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy 2005/06

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Data Analysis<br />

8.39 Although there is no specific number of<br />

affordable houses given in the data, the implications<br />

from the data and the number of houses with<br />

occupancy restrictions demonstrate progress being<br />

made towards providing affordable housing in the<br />

Peak District.<br />

8.40 Employment rates in the High Peak and<br />

Derbyshire Dales are above that for the <strong>East</strong><br />

<strong>Midlands</strong>. Comparison over time is again<br />

complicated by the move to the APS from the LFS.<br />

The ABI data shows that between 2004 and <strong>2005</strong>,<br />

employment in Derbyshire Dales grew by 7.0% while<br />

that in the High Peak fell by 1.0%.<br />

8.41 Two sources of information have been used to<br />

look at the number of visitors to the Peak District and<br />

visitor spend. The STEAM model (Scarborough<br />

Tourism Economic Activity Monitor) provides<br />

estimates for 2003, 2004 and <strong>2005</strong>. However, it covers<br />

the Peak District and Derbyshire county and therefore<br />

overestimates the numbers and spend in the Peak<br />

District. What it suggests is that the average spend<br />

per visitor has remained fairly constant. The data<br />

from the Peak District National Park Survey suggests<br />

much lower spend by day visitors than is estimated in<br />

the STEAM model. The relationship between the<br />

average spend for staying visitors between the two<br />

data sources is more difficult to unravel as one refers<br />

to the spend per stay and the other to the daily spend<br />

per day. What is apparent is that staying visitors<br />

according to the <strong>2005</strong> survey spend approximately<br />

five times more than day visitors, largely due to the<br />

accommodation costs incurred.<br />

Policy Commentary<br />

8.42 There are a host of plans and strategies<br />

covering the Peak Sub-area, either in part or as a<br />

whole. All of these plans are required to help to<br />

secure the conservation and enhancement of the<br />

National Park. Many have either recently been<br />

reviewed or are currently under review.The National<br />

Park Authority is ensuring that the organisations<br />

involved in the production of the plans and<br />

strategies are made aware of the National Park’s<br />

special status when required. All six Local Transport<br />

Plans that cover the Park have recently been<br />

reviewed to cover the period 20<strong>06</strong> to 2011.Three of<br />

these recognise the need to conserve and enhance<br />

the National Park. However, it is reasonable to expect<br />

that recognition of the National Park will vary among<br />

plans according to the extent of coverage of the Park<br />

within their respective areas.The publication of the<br />

new National Park Management Plan for the Peak<br />

District in 2007 will place further emphasis on the<br />

need for partners to work together to ensure<br />

conservation of the Park for future generations.<br />

8.43 In addition to plans, partnerships have and are<br />

being set up to aid conservation of the Peak District,<br />

including the South Pennines Integrated Transport<br />

<strong>Strategy</strong> (SPITS), the Moors for the Future Project and<br />

local rural transport partnerships.<br />

8.44 The social and economic needs of the Peak<br />

District National Park also need to be addressed in<br />

plans and strategies that cover its geography. Several<br />

partnerships exist that attempt to address these<br />

issues, including the Rural Action Zone and the Peak<br />

District Rural Housing Forum.<br />

8.45 The Peak District National Park Authority<br />

monitors housing development in the Park on an<br />

annual basis to assess if the pattern of supply is<br />

sufficient to meet local need without causing undue<br />

damage to the area. In the National Park, annual<br />

dwelling completions remain above the notional 50<br />

identified in the current <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong>.<br />

Due to the high number of completions during<br />

<strong>2005</strong>/<strong>06</strong> that had restricted occupancy, the average<br />

figure of dwelling completions with an occupancy<br />

condition is now above the RSS target for affordable<br />

housing which equates to approximately 25% of<br />

development.<br />

8.46 With regards to provision for businesses, the<br />

Peak District National Park Authority undertakes a<br />

survey of businesses on a 5 yearly basis in order to<br />

identify need for new premises.The findings of the<br />

survey will inform the Local Development<br />

Framework for the National Park.<br />

8.47 No new road developments are planned to<br />

direct traffic around the National Park at present.<br />

Plans to build a bypass around Mottram and<br />

Tintwistle have been delayed due to the large<br />

number of objections received.The Public Inquiry is<br />

now due to commence in May 2007.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Midlands</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> Annual Monitoring Report <strong>2005</strong>/<strong>06</strong><br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!