East Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy 2005/06

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 4.3 - East Midlands All PDL Which may be Available for Development A B C D E Total Land Type Area 2004 hectares Percent 2004 Area 2005 hectares Percent 2005 990 580 2,040 1,140 920 5670 18 10 36 20 16 100 1,100 630 1,730 1,240 840 5,540 Source: NLUD 2004,2005 Land Type A - Previously developed land now vacant Land Type B - Vacant Buildings Land Type C - Derelict Land and Buildings Land Type D - Land or buildings currently in use and allocated in the local plan and/or having planning permission Land Type E - Land or buildings currently in use with redevelopment potential 20 11 31 22 15 100 Table 4.4 - Previously Developed Land as a Proportion of all Developed Land by Type East Midlands 2004 East Midlands 2005 Total area developed land 2001 (includes land which is both available and unavailable for redevelopment) 100.900 ha Vacant Land 1.0% 1.1% Derelict land and buildings 2.0% 1.7% Vacant buildings Allocated in a local plan or with planning permission for any use With known redevelopment potential but no planning allocation or permission All previously developed land that is unused or may be available for redevelopment (i.e. Proportion of all land which has been developed which is available for redevelopment) Source: NLUD 0.6% 1.1% 0.9% 5.6% 0.6% 1.2% 0.8% 5.5% East Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy Annual Monitoring Report 2005/06 43
East Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy Annual Monitoring Report 2005/06 Data Analysis 4.12 A considerable amount of data on the extent and use of previously developed (brownfield) land is available from the National Land Use Database (NLUD). Some of this was presented in the 2004/05 monitoring report but has not been reproduced again as much of the information has not significantly changed and much does not directly report on the indicator used to assess the performance of this policy area. 4.13 The amount of brownfield development in 2005/6 was 204.1hectares, most notably in Derbyshire, compared to 172.7 and 85.0 hectares reported in the 2004/5 and 2003/04 monitoring reports respectively. This appears to represent a significant year on year increase in brownfield development, although comparisons must be made with caution due to missing data, particularly in earlier rounds of monitoring. Only employment land gains are included in these figures. 4.14 The data contained in Tables 4.1 and 4.2 provide information for the past three years on developments on previously developed land.While these show that in a number of cases local authorities have large percentages of new developments on previously developed land some care needs to be taken in interpretation. Figures for employment land by PDL or greenfield status for individual years may vary considerably (e.g. Leicestershire in 2004/5) and may not be representative of progress over the plan period from 2001 to date. Policy Commentary 4.15 Notwithstanding the caveats attached to the incomplete data coverage from the local authority monitoring questionnaires, the total of PDL used for employment purposes has increased in the three years for which information is presented. 4.16 As noted in the previous AMR and in paragraph 4.10 above however, achieving greater levels of PDL usage is only one factor towards achieving the more sustainable patterns of development outlined in RSS Policy 2. 4.17 Derby currently performs well in this regard with the vast majority of development in the last 10- 15 years taking place on ‘brownfield’ land.The primary source of this has been the Pride Park development comprising around 66 hectares of reclaimed old gas works and railway sidings that have been successfully reclaimed and redeveloped for a mix of uses. 4.18 In Derbyshire there has been a steady increase in the percentage of development on PDL, with for example, all but one of the employment completions in High Peak during 2005/6 exceeding the target of 60%. 4.19 There has been a significant increase in the proportion of employment development on PDL in Lincolnshire from last year although this should be treated with caution as these are the only two years for which reasonably complete returns were submitted. 4.20 In Nottinghamshire less brownfield land was developed for employment use in 2005/06 than in previous years but this owes more to the declining availability of such sites and the levels of contamination, ownership issues and infrastructure constraints that exist on many of those that do remain, rather than an indication of policy change. 4.21 There is a relatively restricted supply of brownfield land in Northamptonshire, which will limit available opportunities for future development. Projects do exist in the county to bring forward brownfield employment land, such as the ‘Fit For Market Programme’, but there is less direct intervention in Northamptonshire to bring forward this limited supply of sites. From a policy perspective, the Local Delivery Vehicles and local authorities are currently in the process of developing new core spatial strategies and LDFs. It is likely that, as with existing plans, the need to consider brownfield redevelopment will be a key policy. 44
Page 1 and 2: East Midlands Regional Spatial Stra
Page 3 and 4: contents Executive Summary 9 Sectio
Page 5 and 6: Policy 36 - A Regional Approach to
Page 7 and 8: Policy 11 - Spatial Priorities for
Page 11 and 12: SECTION 1 introduction East Midland
Page 15 and 16: SECTION 2 key points and actions IN
Page 17 and 18: Key Points Take up of Landscape Cha
Page 19 and 20: SECTION 8 Sub-Areas Key Points Key
Page 21 and 22: Further research and joint working
Page 23 and 24: 2.8 One action from the 2004/05 AMR
Page 25 and 26: Policy No. Policy Title 19 Regional
Page 27 and 28: Table 3.2- Percentage of New Dwelli
Page 29 and 30: Table 3.4 - Housing Provision Accor
Page 31 and 32: Housing Provision and Supply Table
Page 33 and 34: Table 3.9 - Affordable Housing Comp
Page 37 and 38: SECTION 4 economy East Midlands Reg
Page 39 and 40: Policy No. Policy Title Key Indicat
Page 41: Policy 2: Locational Priorities for
Page 45 and 46: Table 4.5 - Comparing Employment Ra
Page 49 and 50: Figure 4.6 - Floorspace of Factorie
Page 51 and 52: Table 4.10 - Completed 2005/06 Empl
Page 53 and 54: Table 4.14 - Employment Land Losses
Page 59 and 60: Name Districts Area (Hectares) Reta
Page 61 and 62: Table 4.20 Retail Gains Total Commi
Page 63 and 64: Results: Table 4.22 - New business
Page 65 and 66: Table 4.24 - Continued Jobs in 2003
Page 69 and 70: Table 4.28 - Spend by Visitors (Sta
Page 71 and 72: SECTION 5 environment East Midlands
Page 73 and 74: INTRODUCTION 5.1 This section provi
Page 75 and 76: Policy No. Policy Title Key Indicat
Page 77 and 78: Table 5.1 - County SSSI condition S
Page 79 and 80: Results: Significant Effects Indica
Page 81 and 82: 5.24 Although this proxy indicator
Page 87 and 88: Data Analysis 5.51 The data on plan
Page 89 and 90: Figure 5.8 - East Midlands General
Page 93 and 94:
East Midlands Regional Spatial Stra
Page 95 and 96:
Figure 5.12 - Number of Sites by En
Page 97 and 98:
SECTION 6 minerals, aggregates & wa
Page 99 and 100:
Data Issues 6.2 This section contai
Page 101 and 102:
Table 6.4 Comparison of East Midlan
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Table 6.8 - Existing MSW Capacity 2
Page 107 and 108:
Figure 6.1 Source: Defra Municipal
Page 109 and 110:
Table 6.16 - Best Value Performance
Page 111 and 112:
Table 6.20 - East Midlands’ sub-r
Page 113 and 114:
SECTION 7 transport Key Points Chan
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Policy No. Policy Title Key Indicat
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Cycle Routes - Significant Effect I
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Figure 7.4 - Bus and light rail jou
Page 127 and 128:
Table 7.11 - Regional expenditure o
Page 129 and 130:
Data Analysis 7.43 The tonnage of r
Page 131 and 132:
Data Analysis 7.45 After a period o
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Results: 8.12 There are a number of
Page 143 and 144:
Table 8.6 - Change in number of job
Page 145 and 146:
Table 8.9 - Index of Multiple Depri
Page 147 and 148:
Table 8.11 - Employment Rates (perc
Page 149 and 150:
Table 8.13 - Employment Rates Derby
Page 151 and 152:
Policy 11: Spatial Priorities for D
Page 153 and 154:
Table 8.17- Continued Broxtowe Gedl
Page 155 and 156:
Figure 8.5 - Index of Deprivation i
Page 157 and 158:
APPENDIX 1 data sources and referen
Page 159 and 160:
Section 7 - Transport: • Local Au
show all

East Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy 2005/06

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?