10.05.2015 Views

foster carer prog - Council meetings - Lewisham Council

foster carer prog - Council meetings - Lewisham Council

foster carer prog - Council meetings - Lewisham Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Findings<br />

section 20 notice covering the works would be issued. As all major<br />

works to Brockley Leaseholders properties are capped at £10k within a<br />

five year period, we were told that if any additional works were<br />

required to a property and the leaseholders had already been billed for<br />

the maximum cap then the leaseholder would not be charged.<br />

<strong>Lewisham</strong> Homes reported that Fire Risk Assessors were reviewing the<br />

fire risk assessments on blocks of a similar design to the one involved<br />

in the fire in Southwark. The Fire Authority were also inspecting these<br />

buildings in conjunction with <strong>Lewisham</strong> Homes. The initial inspection<br />

of these buildings had been completed although some more intrusive<br />

examinations were now being carried out. At present there did not<br />

appear to be any major concerns but leaseholders would be re-charged<br />

for any necessary works.<br />

Survey and focus groups<br />

37. The survey and focus groups both assessed leaseholder satisfaction<br />

with the standard of repairs, maintenance and major works. Evidence<br />

from the survey suggested that:<br />

• The majority of respondents (regardless of housing provider) were<br />

dissatisfied with the standard of repairs and maintenance carried out<br />

• The majority of Regenter B3 respondents were dissatisfied with the<br />

standard of major works carried out<br />

• Just under half of <strong>Lewisham</strong> Homes respondents were dissatisfied<br />

with the standard of major works carried out (and just under a third<br />

had no view or had not yet experienced major works).<br />

38. Examples of comments left in the ‘free text’ section of the<br />

questionnaire, relating to the standard of repairs, maintenance and<br />

major works included:<br />

<strong>Lewisham</strong> Homes<br />

• “With ‘best value’ it is always the lowest cost (cheapest) bid that is<br />

appointed for contracts. This results in the quality of work not being<br />

of lasting value, and some work has had to be done again by a<br />

better contractor. A specification of good quality should be set out<br />

for contractors to adhere to and to meet. This investment in quality<br />

would save money in the medium and long term”<br />

• “The cleaning is not up to standard”<br />

• “My roof was damaged in the past. They are supposed to have done<br />

the repair but the job was not done properly. It still leaks when it<br />

rains.”<br />

The <strong>Council</strong>’s obligations to leaseholders<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!