Lightweight Concrete for High Strength - Expanded Shale & Clay
Lightweight Concrete for High Strength - Expanded Shale & Clay
Lightweight Concrete for High Strength - Expanded Shale & Clay
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Changes in moisture migration: the seepage theory views creep as a result of water<br />
movement under stress from micropores to the larger capillary pores. If water migration is the<br />
main factor in concrete creep, both the aggregate porosity (i.e., volume of pores, pore size, and<br />
pore distribution) and the permeability of the cementitious matrix become important factors.<br />
Several (ACI-213, 1999; Holm, 1995; Neville et al., 1983) have cited the importance of using<br />
lightweight aggregate in a saturated condition while mixing. If the aggregate is not saturated, a<br />
more rapid movement of water from the paste would be expected to lead to greater creep. On the<br />
other hand, the moisture conditions given by the saturated lightweight aggregate could replace<br />
the water lost under stress (seepage).<br />
B.2 Shrinkage of HPLC<br />
As occurs with creep of HPLC, there are only a few articles regarding shrinkage of<br />
HPLC. Besides, they usually do not report autogenous and drying shrinkage separately, but as<br />
overall shrinkage. Berra and Ferrada (1990) found that compared with HPC, HPLC had a lower<br />
shrinkage rate, but a higher ultimate value. According the authors, the lower rate was caused by<br />
the presence of water in the aggregate which delays drying. Holm and Bremner (1994) also<br />
observed that HSLC mix lagged behind at early ages, but one-year shrinkage was approximately<br />
14% higher than the HPC counterpart. Holm and Bremner (1994) measured a higher shrinkage<br />
when they incorporated fly ash to the HSLC mix. Malhotra’s (1990) results, on the other hand,<br />
showed that fly ash particles in the HPLC helped to reduce shrinkage after one year.<br />
Leming (1990) reported one-year shrinkage of 4,000-psi and 8,000-psi lightweight<br />
concretes, made with saturated expanded slate, of 390 and 310 µε, respectively while the<br />
corresponding shrinkage of a 4,000-psi NWC was found to be 360 µε. Bilodeau et al. (1995)<br />
investigated HSLC with 28-day compressive strength ranging from 7,250 to 10,000 psi and<br />
found that the 450-day shrinkage was in the range 518 to 667 µε. Curcio et al. (1998) reported<br />
that one-year and ultimate shrinkage of HPLC with Type III cement and fly ash was 450 and 500<br />
µε, respectively.<br />
Kohno et al. (1999) found out that autogenous shrinkage is reduced by the use of<br />
lightweight fine aggregate. They concluded that this is because water lost by self-desiccation of<br />
the cement paste is immediately replaced by moisture from lightweight aggregate. Aïtcin (1992)<br />
reported values of shrinkage of HPLC as low as 70 and 260 µε, after a 28-day curing.<br />
B-3