Lightweight Concrete for High Strength - Expanded Shale & Clay
Lightweight Concrete for High Strength - Expanded Shale & Clay
Lightweight Concrete for High Strength - Expanded Shale & Clay
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A.10.7 ACI Committee 213, 2001<br />
In a draft copy of Chapter 5, ACI 213, shear and diagonal tension strength is covered in<br />
Section 5.8. Committee 213 reports that lightweight concrete members behave in fundamentally<br />
the same manner as normal weight concrete members. They recommend that the permissible<br />
shear capacity may be determined by substituting the splitting tensile strength, f ct /6.7 <strong>for</strong> (f c ’) 1/2<br />
in the shear provisions of Chapter 11, ACI 318.<br />
A.11 Development Length<br />
Development length of prestressing strands is the sum of the transfer length and the<br />
flexural bond length. Development length can be defined as the minimum distance from the end<br />
of the member beyond which the application of a point load will result in a flexural failure. As<br />
in transfer length, many factors are thought to affect development length. Many experimental<br />
programs have addressed development length resulting in suggested equations <strong>for</strong> its prediction.<br />
The Master’s Thesis by Chris Reutlinger, “Direct Pull-Out Capacity and Transfer Length<br />
of 0.6-inch diameter Prestressing Strand in <strong>High</strong> Per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>Concrete</strong>” provides very thorough<br />
coverage of the history and development of equations to predict development length. The<br />
following is a summary of current code provisions and other proposed equations as determined<br />
<strong>for</strong> NWC. The summary closely mirrors the development of transfer length equations. There are<br />
no known equations specifically addressing development length <strong>for</strong> HSLC.<br />
A.11.1 Janney, 1954<br />
Initial development length testing by Janney in 1954 was based on the use of 5/16-inch<br />
wire having two different surface conditions prestressed to 0, 60, 120 and 165 ksi in beams made<br />
with NWC having strengths from 4,500 to 4,800 psi. Janney reported a “wave of flexural bond<br />
stress concentration” and noted that once general bond slip occurred, the beam failed shortly<br />
thereafter. Janney contributed bond in the transfer region predominantly to the Hoyer effect,<br />
which was the confining pressure applied to the wire by the concrete. Janney also reported<br />
improved bond characteristics <strong>for</strong> slightly rusted wire.<br />
A.11.2 Hanson and Kaar, 1959<br />
Hanson and Kaar conducted a study involving 47 small-scale concrete beams rein<strong>for</strong>ced<br />
with various sizes of Grade 250 stress-relieved strand. The tests focused on five factors<br />
A-18