Lightweight Concrete for High Strength - Expanded Shale & Clay
Lightweight Concrete for High Strength - Expanded Shale & Clay
Lightweight Concrete for High Strength - Expanded Shale & Clay
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A.8.5 Martin and Scott, 1976<br />
Martin and Scott re-evaluated previous testing by Hanson and Kaar based on prestressing<br />
strand having an ultimate strength, f pu , of 270 ksi, and commonly encountered strand surface<br />
conditions, and they recommended the implementation of Equation A.7.<br />
l<br />
t<br />
=<br />
80 d<br />
( A.7)<br />
b<br />
A.8.6 Zia and Mostafa, 1977<br />
Based on an extensive review of transfer length testing, Zia and Mostafa proposed<br />
Equation A.8 to account <strong>for</strong> the effects of strand diameter, initial level of prestress, and concrete<br />
strength at transfer. Equation A.9 was reported to be applicable <strong>for</strong> concrete strengths from<br />
2,000 to 8,000 psi. This evaluation is reported in Chapter 9.<br />
where<br />
d b = diameter of prestressing strand<br />
f si = stress in prestressing strands just after release<br />
f ci ’ = concrete compressive strength at release (psi)<br />
l<br />
t<br />
f<br />
si<br />
= 1 .5 d 4.6<br />
( A.8)<br />
' b<br />
−<br />
f<br />
ci<br />
A.8.7 FHWA Memorandum, 1988<br />
Based on testing at the University of North Carolina in 1986 where poor transfer and<br />
development length results were recorded, the FHWA issued a memorandum specifying four<br />
interim restrictions, one of which was the restriction from using 0.6-inch prestressing strand.<br />
This restriction prevented the prestressed concrete industry from fully utilizing the benefits of<br />
higher strength concretes in larger members. Several research programs were initiated based on<br />
the FHWA restrictions.<br />
A-12