02.07.2015 Views

Lightweight Concrete for High Strength - Expanded Shale & Clay

Lightweight Concrete for High Strength - Expanded Shale & Clay

Lightweight Concrete for High Strength - Expanded Shale & Clay

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60 ksi. The alternate design procedure listed in ACI-318 Section 11.4.2.2 <strong>for</strong> predicting shear<br />

strength produced some unconservative predictions <strong>for</strong> concrete compression strengths over<br />

10,000 psi. The method <strong>for</strong> predicting interface shear strength was conservative <strong>for</strong> slate HPLC.<br />

The current AASHTO LRFD (1998) specification provided a conservative prediction of<br />

ultimate shear strength <strong>for</strong> slate HPLC.<br />

7.6 Development Length<br />

An evaluation of current code provisions using the twelve HPLC girder development<br />

length tests in this study and eight normal weight HPC girder tests from Dill (2000) showed the<br />

current AASHTO and ACI provisions to be conservative. The code equations overestimated<br />

development lengths by 19 percent <strong>for</strong> both HPLC and normal weight HPC and never<br />

underestimated them. Use of the current code provisions <strong>for</strong> design of development length <strong>for</strong><br />

slate HPLC and 0.6-inch diameter strand was conservative. Based on the concrete strength range<br />

addressed in this research project, modification of the current code specifications <strong>for</strong><br />

development length was not necessary <strong>for</strong> HPLC or <strong>for</strong> 0.6-inch diameter strands.<br />

Test results showed conclusively that shear cracking in the transfer length region across<br />

the bottom strands did not induce significant strand slip if stirrup density was doubled over the<br />

current AASHTO specified density in the region.<br />

The addition of silica fume into the mix design at a 10% replacement rate by weight of<br />

cementitious materials gave indications of reducing development length.<br />

There was no indication throughout this analysis that need existed to differentiate<br />

between slate HPLC and normal weight HPC. With regard to development length, <strong>for</strong> concrete<br />

compressive strengths over 8,000 psi, the prediction of development length was the same <strong>for</strong><br />

both slate lightweight and normal weight concrete.<br />

7.7 Long Term Per<strong>for</strong>mance of HPLC<br />

Creep of 8,000-psi HPLC after 620 days under load was close to 1,650 µε <strong>for</strong> 40% of<br />

initial strength and approximately 2,000 µε <strong>for</strong> 60% of initial strength. Creep of 10,000-psi<br />

HPLC after 620 days under load was 1,160 µε <strong>for</strong> 40% of initial strength and 1,500 µε <strong>for</strong> 60%<br />

of initial strength. Fifty and ninety percent of the 620-day creep was reached after approximately<br />

16 and 250 days of loading, regardless the type of HPLC.<br />

7-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!