14.08.2012 Views

CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa

CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa

CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

development, so that it is likely that a description of specific simplified<br />

techniques and their application criteria would need to be regularly<br />

reviewed and updated. The legal framework provided by <strong>Level</strong> 2 may<br />

not be sufficiently flexible to achieve this aim;<br />

• The principle of proportionality provides an adequate framework to<br />

ensure that undertakings apply appropriate methodologies <strong>for</strong> the<br />

valuation of technical provisions, including the use of simplified<br />

techniques. The expectations and requirements on the undertaking’s<br />

proportionality assessment 53 are principles-based rather than rulesbased<br />

and would not need to be supplemented by providing simplified<br />

methods on <strong>Level</strong> 2.<br />

3.128 On the other hand, not including to some extent a specification of<br />

simplified valuation techniques on <strong>Level</strong> 2 may erode the intention of the<br />

<strong>Level</strong> 1 text to achieve an increased harmonisation of quantitative and<br />

qualitative supervisory methods, including technical provisions.<br />

3.129 In this regard, recital 53 of the <strong>Level</strong> 1 text states that<br />

(53) […] The principles and actuarial and statistical methodologies<br />

underlying the calculation of those technical provisions should be<br />

harmonised throughout the Community in order to achieve better<br />

comparability and transparency.<br />

3.130 In the same vein, recitals 15 and 58 stipulate that<br />

(15) […] Harmonisation should be increased by providing specific rules<br />

<strong>for</strong> the valuation of assets and liabilities, including technical provisions.<br />

(58) […] The use of effective and harmonised actuarial methodologies<br />

should be required.<br />

3.131 A need to achieve harmonisation would be particularly relevant in areas<br />

where the use of simplified methods in the valuation is widespread, and<br />

where a common understanding of an actuarial “best practice” is still<br />

evolving.<br />

3.132 Not including any detail on specific simplified valuation methods in <strong>Level</strong><br />

2 may also raise concerns with respect to the needs of small and<br />

medium-sized (re)insurance undertakings. 54 Whereas it could be argued<br />

that these needs are sufficiently addressed in a proper application of the<br />

principle of proportionality, an inclusion of specific simplified valuation<br />

methods in <strong>Level</strong> 2 may be helpful <strong>for</strong> small and medium-sized<br />

undertakings in<br />

• making available valuation techniques which are tailored to the<br />

specificities of their business; and<br />

• providing legal certainty on the appropriateness of such techniques<br />

under the Solvency II framework.<br />

3.133 This consideration is also reflected in recital 59 of the <strong>Level</strong> 1 text which<br />

states that<br />

53 See section 3.1 <strong>for</strong> details<br />

54 Note that the <strong>Level</strong> 1 text emphasises that the new solvency regime should not be too burdensome <strong>for</strong><br />

small and medium-sized insurance undertakings, cf. Recital 14b of the <strong>Level</strong> 1 text.<br />

31/112<br />

© CEIOPS 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!