CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa
CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa
CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Life insurance<br />
3.323 With respect to the lines of business within life insurance a somewhat<br />
simpler approach was described in connection with the QIS4-exercise.<br />
According to that approach the risk margin <strong>for</strong> a given line of business<br />
within life insurance (CoCMlob) could be calculated according to the following<br />
<strong>for</strong>mula:<br />
CoCMlob = (CoC/(1+r1))·Durmod,lob(0)·SCRRU,lob(0),<br />
where the following variables and parameters all relate to the same line of<br />
business:<br />
SCRRU,lob(0) = the SCR as calculated at time t = 0 <strong>for</strong> the reference<br />
undertaking’s portfolio of (re)insurance obligations;<br />
Durmod,lob(0) = the modified duration of reference undertaking’s (re)insurance<br />
obligations net of reinsurance at t = 0; and<br />
CoC = the Cost-of-Capital rate.<br />
This approach applies also to life-like non-life obligations (e.g. non-life<br />
annuities).<br />
3.324 This simplification takes into account the maturity and the run-off pattern<br />
of the obligations net of reinsurance. However, it is based on the following<br />
simplified assumptions:<br />
• the composition and the proportions of the risks and sub-risks do not<br />
change over the years (basic SCR),<br />
• the average credit standing of reinsurers and SPVs remains the same<br />
over the years (counterparty default risk),<br />
• the modified duration is the same <strong>for</strong> obligations net and gross of<br />
reinsurance (operational risk, counterparty default risk),<br />
• the unavoidable market risk in relation to the net best estimate<br />
remains the same over the years (market risk),<br />
• the loss absorbing capacity of the technical provisions in relation to<br />
the net best estimate remains the same over the years (adjustment).<br />
3.325 An undertaking that intends to use this simplification <strong>for</strong> one or several<br />
lines of business (or homogenous risk groups), should consider to what<br />
extend the assumptions referred to in para 3.324 are fulfilled <strong>for</strong> the<br />
line(s) of business in question. If some or all of these assumptions do not<br />
hold, the undertaking should carry out (at least) a qualitative assessment<br />
of how material the deviation from the assumptions is. If the impact of the<br />
deviation is not material compared to the risk margin as a whole, then the<br />
simplification can be used. Otherwise the undertaking should either adjust<br />
the <strong>for</strong>mula appropriately or be encouraged to use a more sophisticated<br />
calculation or method.<br />
67/112<br />
© CEIOPS 2010