14.08.2012 Views

CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa

CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa

CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

may be derived by applying Gross-to-Net techniques to the best<br />

estimates components referred to above. 93<br />

3.397 The technical provisions net of reinsurance in the given homogeneous<br />

risk group or line of business would then exhibit the same components<br />

as the gross provisions, i.e.<br />

PPNet = the best estimate of premiums provisions net of<br />

reinsurance;<br />

PCONet = the best estimate of claims provisions net of reinsurance;<br />

and<br />

RM = the risk margin.<br />

Step 2:Determination of reinsurance recoverables as difference between gross<br />

and net valuations<br />

3.398 On basis of the results of step 1, the reinsurance recoverables (RR) per<br />

homogenous risk groups (or lines of business) may be calculated as<br />

follows (using the notation as introduced above):<br />

RR = (PPGross – PPNet) + (PCOGross – PCONet)<br />

3.399 Note that implicitly this calculation assumes that the value of reinsurance<br />

recoverables does not need to be decomposed into best estimate and<br />

risk margin components.<br />

Step 3: Assessment of compatibility of reinsurance recoverables with Article 81<br />

3.400 In this step, it would need to be assessed whether the determination of<br />

the reinsurance recoverables in step 2 is consistent with Article 81 of the<br />

<strong>Level</strong> 1 text.<br />

3.401 In particular, this would require an analysis as to whether the issues<br />

referred to in the second and third paragraph of Article 81, i.e. the time<br />

difference between direct payments and recoveries and the expected<br />

losses due to counterparty risks, were taken into account. Additional<br />

level 3 guidance may be provided.<br />

3.402 To achieve consistency with the required adjustment related to expected<br />

losses due to counterparty defaults, it would generally be necessary to<br />

integrate an analogous adjustment into the determination of net of<br />

reinsurance valuation components in step 1. Such an adjustment would<br />

need to be treated separately (in the context of Article 86(g) as well as<br />

the relevant aspects of the SCR counterparty risk module) and would not<br />

be covered by one of the gross-to-net techniques discussed in this subsection.<br />

3.4.2.3. The Scope of Gross-to-Net Techniques<br />

3.403 It follows from the summary of the QIS4-results that Gross-to-Net<br />

techniques 94 have been extensively used by all kind of participating nonlife<br />

insurance undertakings (irrespectively of their size). This illustrates<br />

93 Alternatively, the best estimates net of reinsurance may also be derived directly, e.g. on basis of triangles<br />

with net of reinsurance claims data.<br />

94 Cf. annex B.<br />

82/112<br />

© CEIOPS 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!