CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa
CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa
CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
may be derived by applying Gross-to-Net techniques to the best<br />
estimates components referred to above. 93<br />
3.397 The technical provisions net of reinsurance in the given homogeneous<br />
risk group or line of business would then exhibit the same components<br />
as the gross provisions, i.e.<br />
PPNet = the best estimate of premiums provisions net of<br />
reinsurance;<br />
PCONet = the best estimate of claims provisions net of reinsurance;<br />
and<br />
RM = the risk margin.<br />
Step 2:Determination of reinsurance recoverables as difference between gross<br />
and net valuations<br />
3.398 On basis of the results of step 1, the reinsurance recoverables (RR) per<br />
homogenous risk groups (or lines of business) may be calculated as<br />
follows (using the notation as introduced above):<br />
RR = (PPGross – PPNet) + (PCOGross – PCONet)<br />
3.399 Note that implicitly this calculation assumes that the value of reinsurance<br />
recoverables does not need to be decomposed into best estimate and<br />
risk margin components.<br />
Step 3: Assessment of compatibility of reinsurance recoverables with Article 81<br />
3.400 In this step, it would need to be assessed whether the determination of<br />
the reinsurance recoverables in step 2 is consistent with Article 81 of the<br />
<strong>Level</strong> 1 text.<br />
3.401 In particular, this would require an analysis as to whether the issues<br />
referred to in the second and third paragraph of Article 81, i.e. the time<br />
difference between direct payments and recoveries and the expected<br />
losses due to counterparty risks, were taken into account. Additional<br />
level 3 guidance may be provided.<br />
3.402 To achieve consistency with the required adjustment related to expected<br />
losses due to counterparty defaults, it would generally be necessary to<br />
integrate an analogous adjustment into the determination of net of<br />
reinsurance valuation components in step 1. Such an adjustment would<br />
need to be treated separately (in the context of Article 86(g) as well as<br />
the relevant aspects of the SCR counterparty risk module) and would not<br />
be covered by one of the gross-to-net techniques discussed in this subsection.<br />
3.4.2.3. The Scope of Gross-to-Net Techniques<br />
3.403 It follows from the summary of the QIS4-results that Gross-to-Net<br />
techniques 94 have been extensively used by all kind of participating nonlife<br />
insurance undertakings (irrespectively of their size). This illustrates<br />
93 Alternatively, the best estimates net of reinsurance may also be derived directly, e.g. on basis of triangles<br />
with net of reinsurance claims data.<br />
94 Cf. annex B.<br />
82/112<br />
© CEIOPS 2010