CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa
CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa
CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Annex A. Example to illustrate the first method of simplification to<br />
calculate the best estimate of incurred but not reported claims<br />
provision.<br />
General <strong>for</strong>mulation.<br />
The final estimate of this technical provision is derived from the following<br />
expression, where just <strong>for</strong> illustrative purposes a three-year period of<br />
observation has been considered (the adaptation of the <strong>for</strong>mula <strong>for</strong> longer series<br />
is immediate):<br />
where<br />
and<br />
IBNR reserve year t = C t x N t ,<br />
C t = average cost of IBNR claims, after taking into account inflation<br />
and discounting. This cost should be based on the average cost of<br />
claims reported in the year t. Since a part of the overall cost of<br />
claims reported in the year t comes from provisions, a correction <strong>for</strong><br />
the possible bias should be applied.<br />
Nt = Rt * Av, being<br />
AV = [ (Nt-1 / p1) + (Nt-2 / p2) + Nt-3 ] / [ R t-1+R t-2+R t-3 ]<br />
Furthermore, in these expressions<br />
N t-i = number of claims incurred but not reported at the end of the year<br />
t-i, independently of the accident year (to assess the number of IBNR<br />
claims all the in<strong>for</strong>mation known by the undertaking till the end of the<br />
year t should be included).<br />
P1= percentage of IBNR claims at the end of year t-3 that have been<br />
reported during the year t-2<br />
p2= percentage of IBNR claims at the end of year t-3 that have been<br />
reported during the years t-2 and t-1<br />
R t-i= claims reported in year t, independently of accident year.<br />
It should be noted that the sufficiency of this method should be regularly<br />
checked using run-off results.<br />
Numeric example<br />
Assuming as date of reference of the valuation December the 31 st of 2008, the<br />
undertaking has the following in<strong>for</strong>mation:<br />
N_2007 = 90<br />
N_2006 = 100<br />
95/112<br />
© CEIOPS 2010