14.08.2012 Views

CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa

CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa

CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Annex A. Example to illustrate the first method of simplification to<br />

calculate the best estimate of incurred but not reported claims<br />

provision.<br />

General <strong>for</strong>mulation.<br />

The final estimate of this technical provision is derived from the following<br />

expression, where just <strong>for</strong> illustrative purposes a three-year period of<br />

observation has been considered (the adaptation of the <strong>for</strong>mula <strong>for</strong> longer series<br />

is immediate):<br />

where<br />

and<br />

IBNR reserve year t = C t x N t ,<br />

C t = average cost of IBNR claims, after taking into account inflation<br />

and discounting. This cost should be based on the average cost of<br />

claims reported in the year t. Since a part of the overall cost of<br />

claims reported in the year t comes from provisions, a correction <strong>for</strong><br />

the possible bias should be applied.<br />

Nt = Rt * Av, being<br />

AV = [ (Nt-1 / p1) + (Nt-2 / p2) + Nt-3 ] / [ R t-1+R t-2+R t-3 ]<br />

Furthermore, in these expressions<br />

N t-i = number of claims incurred but not reported at the end of the year<br />

t-i, independently of the accident year (to assess the number of IBNR<br />

claims all the in<strong>for</strong>mation known by the undertaking till the end of the<br />

year t should be included).<br />

P1= percentage of IBNR claims at the end of year t-3 that have been<br />

reported during the year t-2<br />

p2= percentage of IBNR claims at the end of year t-3 that have been<br />

reported during the years t-2 and t-1<br />

R t-i= claims reported in year t, independently of accident year.<br />

It should be noted that the sufficiency of this method should be regularly<br />

checked using run-off results.<br />

Numeric example<br />

Assuming as date of reference of the valuation December the 31 st of 2008, the<br />

undertaking has the following in<strong>for</strong>mation:<br />

N_2007 = 90<br />

N_2006 = 100<br />

95/112<br />

© CEIOPS 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!