14.08.2012 Views

CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa

CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa

CEIOPS' Advice for Level 2 Implementing ... - EIOPA - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

company or new line of business, although only temporarily until<br />

achieving sufficient in<strong>for</strong>mation to apply standard methods. However,<br />

where the lack of in<strong>for</strong>mation is expected to be permanent (e.g. the case<br />

of ‘tail’ risks with a very slow process of collecting claims in<strong>for</strong>mation),<br />

the undertaking would be required to complement the data available by<br />

making extra ef<strong>for</strong>ts to look <strong>for</strong> relevant external in<strong>for</strong>mation to allow<br />

the understanding of the underlying risks and to use extensively<br />

adequate expert opinion and judgements. Documentation is also a key<br />

aspect in this subject. 64<br />

3.2.3.3. Incurred but not reported claims provision. First<br />

simplification<br />

3.233 Description. This simplification applies to the calculation of the best<br />

estimate of incurred but not reported claims (IBNR) by means an<br />

estimation of the number of claims that would expected to be declared in<br />

the followings years and the cost thereof.<br />

3.234 Calculation. The final estimate of this technical provision is derived from<br />

the following expression, where just <strong>for</strong> illustrative purposes a threeyear<br />

period of observation has been considered (the adaptation of the<br />

<strong>for</strong>mula <strong>for</strong> longer series is immediate):<br />

where<br />

and<br />

IBNR reserve year t = C t x N t ,<br />

C t = average cost of IBNR claims, after taking into account inflation<br />

and discounting. This cost should be based on the historical average<br />

cost of claims reported in the after the relevant accident year. Since<br />

a part of the overall cost of claims comes from provisions, a<br />

correction <strong>for</strong> the possible bias should be applied.<br />

Nt = Rt * Av, being<br />

AV = [ (Nt-1 / p1) + (Nt-2 / p2) + Nt-3 ] / [ R t-1+R t-2+R t-3 ]<br />

Furthermore, in these expressions<br />

N t-i = number of claims incurred but not reported at the end of the year<br />

t-i, independently of the accident year (to assess the number of IBNR<br />

claims all the in<strong>for</strong>mation known by the undertaking till the end of the<br />

year t should be included).<br />

p1= percentage of IBNR claims at the end of year t-3 that have been<br />

reported during the year t-2<br />

p2= percentage of IBNR claims at the end of year t-3 that have been<br />

reported during the years t-2 and t-1<br />

R t-i= claims reported in year t, independently of accident year.<br />

64 See CEIOPS CP43 ‘Standards <strong>for</strong> data quality’,<br />

49/112<br />

© CEIOPS 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!