11.07.2015 Views

Wambo Coal AEMR 2010-2011 - Peabody Energy

Wambo Coal AEMR 2010-2011 - Peabody Energy

Wambo Coal AEMR 2010-2011 - Peabody Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Wambo</strong> <strong>Coal</strong> Pty Limited<strong>2010</strong>-<strong>2011</strong> <strong>AEMR</strong>No202122Date & TimeReceived31/01/116.40am12/02/<strong>2011</strong>8.15am16/02/<strong>2011</strong>10.40pmNature of ComplaintNoiseNoiseNoise23 21/02/<strong>2011</strong> Lighting24 25/02/<strong>2011</strong> Noise25 27/02/<strong>2011</strong> Noise26 5/03/<strong>2011</strong> LightingAction Taken By <strong>Wambo</strong>in hot, dry conditions.. Investigations of real time dust monitors and weather data indicated high regionaldust.WCPL received an enquiry of excessive operational noise. Investigation concluded no unusual operationsoccurring during the period described by the community member. Noise Data Report indicated noexceedence of consent noise criteria (40dB).WCPL received an enquiry of excessive operational noise. Investigation concluded no unusual operationsoccurring during the period described by the community member. Noise Monitoring reported average LowFrequency noise levels for the night period at 35.6dB. Wind direction for the complaint period was from theSSW (complainant is due south of operation). Review of noise files indicated mine noise audible inbackground.Enquiry lodged via community enquiries line regarding excessive operational noise from <strong>Wambo</strong>. Receivedmessage next morning and contacted both CHPP and Open Cut Operation supervisors to investigatepossible excessive noise. Downloaded noise files and Met Data from <strong>Wambo</strong> weather station. No unusualoperations were occurring during the period described by complainant. Noise Monitoring Report fromSentinex 15 for the 16/02/<strong>2011</strong> reported average Low Frequency noise levels for the night period at34.9dB. Met conditioned were unlikely to enhance noise at complainant’s house. Review of noise filesindicated mine noise audible in background. Rain from 8 -9.30pm.Community member called DoP Singleton and described light shining towards their house. DoP contacted<strong>Wambo</strong> who contacted Open Cut production supervisor to re-align lights away from the communitymembers property. Follow up indicated that the community member had contacted DoP and said theoffending lights had been moved.Community member called DoP complaining of excessive operational noise (engines revving and hornsblowing) between 5am and 7am. WCPL received a complaint of excessive operational noise. Investigationsconcluded no unusual operations were occurring during the period described by complainant. NoiseMonitoring Report indicated average Low Frequency noise levels for the night period at 34.9dB. Winddirection for the complaint period was from the SE (complainant is due south of operation).Review of noisefiles indicated mine noise audible in background.Community member contacted the <strong>Wambo</strong> Community Enquiries Line at 7.57am indicating <strong>Wambo</strong>operational noise was excessive from approx 2am to 7.30am.No unusual operations were occurring during the period described by the community member. Noisemonitoring reported average Low Frequency noise levels for the night period at 38.0dB and for the dayperiod of 36.3. 15 minute average for 7.45 am was 44dB(A). Atmospheric conditions were very still andcould have enhanced noise levels at the monitor. Review of noise files indicated mine noise audible inbackground.Community member called DECCW twice regarding light shining towards house. Complained also that the<strong>Wambo</strong> environmental hotline was not working.Following an investigation, we have determined that open cut personnel had mistakenly positioned aportable lighting plant in an exposed area directly north of the landholder’s residence. Although thelandholder’s residence was approximately 3.5km from the lighting plant (and the lighting plant was notdirectly facing the residence), unfortunately the position of the plant has resulted in the lighting complaint.Appendix 4: Register of Community Complaints

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!