11.07.2015 Views

Wambo Coal AEMR 2010-2011 - Peabody Energy

Wambo Coal AEMR 2010-2011 - Peabody Energy

Wambo Coal AEMR 2010-2011 - Peabody Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

aemc<strong>Wambo</strong> <strong>Coal</strong> Mine, Rail Loop and <strong>Coal</strong> LoaderIndependent Environmental Audit – Minister’s Condition of ApprovalStructural Adequacy7 The Applicant shall ensure that all new buildings and structures, andany alterations or additions to existing buildings and structures, areconstructed in accordance with the relevant requirement of the BCA.Demolition8 The Applicant shall ensure that all demolition work is carried out inaccordance with AS 2601-2001: The Demolition of Structures, or itsequivalent latest version.Protection of Public Infrastructure9 The Applicant shall:(a) repair, or pay the full cost associated with repairing any publicinfrastructure that is damaged by the development; and(b) relocate, or pay the full cost associated with relocating, any publicinfrastructure that needs to be relocated as a result of thedevelopment.Operation of Plant and Equipment10 The Applicant shall ensure that all items of plant and equipment usedat the site, are:(a) maintained in a proper and efficient condition; and(b) operated in a proper and efficient mannerSCHEDULE 4 GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONSACQUISITION UPON REQUEST1 Upon receiving a written request for acquisition from the landowner ofthe land listed in Table 1, the Applicant shall acquire the land inaccordance with the procedures in conditions 1-3 of schedule 5.Table 1: Land subject to acquisition upon request19 - L Kelly 51 - CM Hawkes Pty Ltd20 - Jerrys Plains <strong>Coal</strong> Terminal 55 - E & C Burley22 - OJ Henderson 56 - K & L Haynes23 - HE Kannar2 While the land listed in Table 1 is privately owned, the Applicant shallimplement all practicable measures to ensure that the impacts of thedevelopment comply with the predictions in the SEE, and the relevantconditions in this consent, at any residence on this land, to thesatisfaction of the Director-General.NOISENoise Impact Assessment CriteriaThe Applicant shall ensure that the noise generated by thedevelopment does not exceed the noise impact assessment criteria3presented in Table 2.Table 2: Noise impact assessment criteria dB(A) Review of LandscapeAmelioration Treatments forthe Hawkes Property,EDAW Australia, Apr 2006 Letter from DoP reMitigation of Visual ImpactSpringwood Property(Hawkes), 2 Mar 2006YesYesNot triggeredNotedNotedYesNotedJul 2007-Jun 2008 6,328,629 (includes 2,331,866from United).Jul 2006-Jun 2007 4,108,697The rail loop and rail loader structures were constructed inaccordance with the BCA.No demolition works were required during the construction ofthe rail loader or rail loop.The visual impact assessment of the Springwood propertyWarkworth Village (property 51 - Hawkes owner) wasconsidered by DoP to be entirely consistent with informationpresented in the <strong>Wambo</strong> EIS and SEE and <strong>Wambo</strong> wasobliged to implement the requirements of the MCoA in relationto visual amenity related to the Springwood property.The EDAW report proposed landscape treatments and theseamelioration works were commenced by <strong>Wambo</strong> in 2006.trevor brown & associates 96applied environmental management consultants

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!