11.07.2015 Views

Contents & Foreword, Characterizing And ... - IRRI books

Contents & Foreword, Characterizing And ... - IRRI books

Contents & Foreword, Characterizing And ... - IRRI books

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

gave a positive yield response with application of 75 kg K ha –1 . In the third, fourth,and fifth trials, there was no increase in grain yields due to either increases in soil Kstatus (third and fifth trials) or low in-crop rainfall (fourth trial).The prevalence of high soil K status in Java needs to be considered along withthe K balance of the soil when formulating K fertilizer recommendations. A positivesoil K balance was shown to occur when K was applied to some treatments in Jakenanrainfed rice trials. In the treatments at Jakenan where N and P were added without K,the K balance was negative, whereas adding NPK (120:18:75) gave an increase insoil K (Wihardjaka et al 1998). Trials with irrigated rice in Java (Dobermann et al1996a), however, showed that K uptake was greater than the amount applied, thuscreating a negative K balance in the soil at the end of the season. Cropping systemswith a negative K balance are unsustainable in the long term and K fertilizers need tobe applied to reduce the risk of K deficiencies. Thus, there is only one recommendedrate for the whole of Java: 26 kg K ha –1 (Karama et al 1998).Lowland rice has been shown to be more responsive to fertilizer K in Sumatrathan in Java. This reflects the fact that low-K areas are more prevalent in Lampung(Fig. 5). Unlike in Java, however, soil P maps are not related to soil K maps. Resultsfrom soil K mapping in Lampung are supported by a soil survey conducted in 1998for the Acid Soils Project, which found that 25 of 32 lowland sites had low soil K(166 mgK kg –1 ) (Karama et al 1998). Despite the need for K fertilizer to be applied in thelowlands of Sumatra, no K fertilizer recommendations specific to that region havebeen developed.Developing K recommendations is hampered by the difficulty in relating soil Kextracted by 1M NH 4 Oac to grain yields. Dobermann et al (1996b) concluded thatpredicting crop K uptake in irrigated rice using a static soil test was not practicalbecause too many soil properties (extractable K, Ca, and Mg combined, CEC, organicmatter, clay content) were required to give accurate results. K uptake in irrigatedlowland rice has been shown to be related to soil K (r 2 = 0.82) as measuredusing mixed-bed ion exchange resin capsules (Dobermann et al 1996b). Ion exchangeresins have the advantage of being able to measure the amount of K that can be extractedfrom a soil over time rather than measuring K in solution at a particular moment.Dynamic measurements of K are required for intensive cropping systems andwhere the soils have K-fixing properties.Data used to test the validity of predicting total K uptake at harvest in lowlandrice were derived from NPK trials conducted at 11 sites in five countries includingIndonesia with K as the only limiting factor (Dobermann et al 1996b). K fertilizerrates varied between sites from 25 to 100 kg K ha –1 , soil pH ranged from 5.7 to 8.5,and clay contents ranged from 25% to 57%. This same method could possibly be usedto predict K uptake by rainfed lowland rice in locations within Java and Lampung.182 Clough et al

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!