27.11.2012 Views

Technical Report No. 8 PORT AND SHIPPING

Technical Report No. 8 PORT AND SHIPPING

Technical Report No. 8 PORT AND SHIPPING

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I-4-17<br />

Vietnam National Transport Strategy Study (VITRANSS)<br />

<strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>No</strong>. 8<br />

Shipping and Ports<br />

fourth criterion will really depend on the economic development in the south<br />

and the development policy on regional port system that will encourage<br />

container cargo trade to Vung Tau. Last but not least is Vietnam’s inherent<br />

weakness. Hong Kong and Singapore have exerted effort to attract the<br />

capital investment of foreign shipping lines as well as forwarders. Today,<br />

Singapore aims to become a regional business hub, encouraging foreign<br />

shipping lines to locate their regional headquarters in Singapore by giving<br />

them tax incentives. On the other hand, the Vietnamese government has not<br />

opened the transport industry to foreign investment. According to the ASEAN<br />

Framework Agreement on Services and its Protocols (CPC7212),<br />

government:<br />

(1) Allows foreign shipping companies to establish a representative office<br />

only;<br />

(2) Restricts representative offices of foreign shipping companies from<br />

conducting business activities in Vietnam; and<br />

(3) Requires foreign shipping companies to appoint their Vietnamese<br />

shipping agency counterpart as its general agent to supply maritime<br />

services.<br />

4) A Transshipment Port in the Central Region<br />

The VITRANSS Study Team recognizes some issues related to<br />

transshipment port in central Vietnam. According to MOT Decision <strong>No</strong>.<br />

608/QD-GTVT (13 March 1999), the Vietnamese government has a study<br />

plan to create a transshipment port facility at two candidate sites, i.e., Chan<br />

May and Vang Phong in the central region. However, when compared with<br />

the Vung Tau project, the viability of both sites is lower due to scarce<br />

hinterland population and inactive economy even if some parts of Lao and<br />

Cambodia are included.<br />

It is true that there is some opportunity for a mega shipping line to construct a<br />

private transshipment port regardless of hinterland development. Evergreen,<br />

ranking second as the global container carrier, made such MOUs with the<br />

Indonesian government for a port at Batam Island (20km south from<br />

Singapore) in 1993 and the Vietnamese government at Vung Tau in 1996.<br />

However, both MOUs are not in effect anymore, thus hindering port<br />

construction.<br />

Moreover, due to the inconvenient location, a transshipment port in the<br />

central region would apparently burden many shippers and consignees with<br />

additional transport costs. Therefore the project cannot justify tapping any<br />

public fund for port construction and related infrastructure development.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!