11.07.2015 Views

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Collapsed Riemannian Manifolds with Bounded Sectional Curvature 331Theorem 3.4 (Almost flat manifolds). ([Grl]) Let Aff ^^y X be as in (3.1).If X is a point, then a finite normal covering space <strong>of</strong> M <strong>of</strong> order at most c(n) isdiffeomorphic to a nilmanifold N n /Y'i (i large), where N n is the simply connectednilpotent group.Theorem 3.4 can be promoted to a description <strong>of</strong> convergent collapsing sequence,<strong>of</strong> manifolds, M, as in (3.1). As mentioned following Theorem 1.2, anysufficiently collapsed manifold admits a nilpotent Killing structure; see [CFG]. Herea bound on diameter forces the nilpotent Killing structure to be pure.For a closed Riemannian manifold M n , its frame bundle F(M n ) admits acanonical metric determined by the Riemannian connection up to a choice <strong>of</strong> a biinvariantmetric on 0(n). A fibration, N/Y —t F(M n ) —t Y, is called 0(n)-invariantif the 0(n)-action on F(M n ) preserves both the fiber N/Y (a nilmanifold) and thestructural group. By the 0(n)-invariance, 0(n) also acts on the base space Y. Acanonical metric is invariant if its restriction on each N/Y is left-invariant. A purenilpotent Killing structure on M is an 0(n)-invariant fibration on F(M n ) for whichthe canonical metric is also invariant.Theorem 3.5 (Fibration). ([CFG]) Let Aff ^ yX be as in (3.1). Then F(M?)equipped with canonical metrics contains a convergent subsequence, F(M")GH > Y,and F(M") admits an 0(n)-invariant fibration N/Y'i —t F(M") —t Y for which thecanonical metric is ei-close in the C 1 sense to some invariant metric, where e, —¥ 0.The following properties are crucial for the study <strong>of</strong> particular instances <strong>of</strong>collapsing as in (3.1).Proposition 3.6. Let Aff ^^y X be as in (3.1).(3.6.1) (Regularity) ([Ro5]) For any e > 0, M admits an invariant metric gi suchthat min(secM?) — e < sec (M?,g i ) < max(secMp) + e for i large.(3.6.2) (Equivariance) ([PT], [GK]) The induced 0(n)actions on Y from the O(reactionon F(M") are C 1 -close and therefore are all 0(n)-equivariant for i large.f. Obstructions to collapsing with bounded diameterTheorem 3.7 (Polarized F-structure and vanishing minimal volume).([CR2]) Let M"GH > X be as in (3.1). Then the F-sub structure associated to thepure nilpotent Killing structure on M contains a (mixed) polarized F-structure. Inparticular, MinVol(Mf) = 0.Theorem 3.7 may be viewed as a weak version <strong>of</strong> the Gromov's gap conjecture.Note that the associated F-structure on M may not be polarized. The existence<strong>of</strong> a polarized substructure puts constraints on the singularities <strong>of</strong> the structure.Theorem 3.8 (Absence <strong>of</strong> symplectic structure). ([FR3]) Let Mf ^ ^ X beas in (3.1). Ifm(M) is finite, then M does not support any symplectic structure.The pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> Theorem 3.8 includes a nontrivial extension <strong>of</strong> the well knownfact that any S 1 -action on a closed simply connected symplectic manifold whichpreserves the symplectic structure has a nonempty fixed point set.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!