11.07.2015 Views

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Geometrie Langlands Correspondence for GL n 581latter. Unfortunately, it is not true that the "elementary" functor Av„^ is exact.However, it will be exact when regarded as a functor acting on a certain quotientcategory.5.3. We introduce the category D(Bun„) as the quotient <strong>of</strong> D(Bun„) by a triangulatedsubcategory Dd egen (Bun n ). (An object J £ D(Bun„) belongs to Drf ese „(Bun„)essentially when it is degenerate, i.e., when it vanishes in the Whittaker model.)The quotient D(Bun„) possesses the following three crucial properties:1) The perverse i-structure on D(Bun„) induces a well-defined i-structure on D(Bun^2) The Hecke functors E, x : D(Bun„) —t D(Bun„) gives rise to well-defined functorsD(Bun„) —t D(Bun„), and the latter functors are exact in the sense <strong>of</strong> the t-structure on D(Bun„).3) The subcategory Drf ese „(Bun„) is orthogonal to the subcategory <strong>of</strong> cuspidalsheaves. I.e., if 3^1,3^2 £ D(Bun„) are such that 7i is cuspidal and the image<strong>of</strong> 3^ in D(Bun„) vanishes, then Hom D ( B un„)(3 r i ) 3^) — Hom D ( B un„)(3 r 2 ) 3 r i) = 0.5.4. The main step in the pro<strong>of</strong> that the functor Av n E is the following:5.5. Theorem. The functor AY„ : E : D(Bun„) —t D(Bun„) descends to a welldefinedfunctor D(Bun„) —t D(Bun„), and the latter functor is exact.The main idea behind the pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> Theorem 5.5. is the same phenomenon asthe one that forbids the existence <strong>of</strong> Hecke eigen-sheaves on Bun„ with respect tolocal systems <strong>of</strong> a wrong rank. Namely, if J is a perverse sheaf on Bun„ such thatthe corresponding object <strong>of</strong> D(Bun„) violates Theorem 5.5., then by looking at thebehavior <strong>of</strong> H d (J) £ Y)(X d x Bun„) around the various diagonals in X d , we arriveto a contradiction.Using Theorem 5.5. the pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the exactness <strong>of</strong> Av^ E proceeds as follows:From (5.1) (and using the fact that taking invariants is an exact functor), we obtainthat the functor Av^ E is well-defined and exact on the quotient category D(Bun„).Moreover, by induction on n we can assume that for any J £ D(Bun„), Av n E (J)is cuspidal.Hence, if J is a perverse sheaf on Bun„, in the cohomological truncationsarrowsA°(Av^(3-)) and r

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!