11.07.2015 Views

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

98 J. T. Stafford4. Noneommutative curves and surfacesAs we have seen, twisted homogeneous coordinate rings are fundamental to thestudy <strong>of</strong> noneommutative projective planes. However, a more natural starting placewould be eg algebras <strong>of</strong> Gelfand-Kirillov dimension two since, as we suggested in theintroduction, these should correspond to noneommutative curves. Their structureis particularly simple.Theorem 7 [4] Let R be a eg domain <strong>of</strong> GK-dimension 2 generated in degree one.Then there exists an irreducible curve Y with automorphism a and ample invertiblesheaf £ such that R embeds into the twisted homogeneous coordinate ring B(Y,£,a)with finite index. Equivalently, R n = H°(Y, £ ® £" ® • • • ® £" n ) for n >• 0.By (3.1) we may apply Theorem 5 to obtain part (1) <strong>of</strong> the next result.Corollary 8 Let R be as in Theorem 7. Then:(1) R is a noetherian domain with qgrF ~ coh(Y). In particular, qgrF ~ qgrCfor the commutative ring C = B(Y,£,M).(2) If \a\ < oo then R is a finite module over its centre. If \a\ = oo, then R is aprimitive ring with at most two height one prime ideals.If F is not generated in degree one, then the analogue <strong>of</strong> Theorem 7 is moresubtle, since more complicated algebras appear. See [4] for the details. One shouldreally make a further generalization by allowing F to be prime rather than a domainand to allowing k to be arbitrary (since this allows one to consider the projectiveanalogues <strong>of</strong> classical orders over Dedekind domains). Theorem 7 and Corollary 8do generalize appropriately but the results are more technical. The details can befound in [5].Although these results are satisfying they are really only half <strong>of</strong> the story.As in the commutative case one would also like to define noneommutative curvesabstractly and then show that they can indeed be described by graded rings <strong>of</strong> theappropriate form. Such a result appears in [19] but to state it we need a definition.Let C be an Ext-finite abelian category <strong>of</strong> finite homological dimension withderived category <strong>of</strong> bounded complexes D b (C). Recall that a cohomological functorH : D b (C) —¥ mod(fc) is <strong>of</strong> finite type if, for A £ D b (C), only a finite number<strong>of</strong> the H(A[n]) are non-zero. The category C is saturated if every cohomologicalfunctor H : D b (C) —¥ mod(fc) <strong>of</strong> finite type is <strong>of</strong> the form Hom(A, —) (that is, H isrepresentable). If X is a smooth projective scheme, then coh(X) is saturated [10],so it is not unreasonable to use this as part <strong>of</strong> the definition <strong>of</strong> a "noneommutativesmooth curve."Theorem 9 (Reiten-Van den Bergh [19, Theorem V.l.2]) Assume thatC is a connectedsaturated hereditary noetherian category. Then C has one <strong>of</strong> the followingforms:(1) mod(A) where A is an indecomposable finite dimensional hereditary algebra.(2) coh(ö) where Ö is a sheaf <strong>of</strong> hereditary Ox-orders over a smooth connectedprojective curve X.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!