11.07.2015 Views

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Non-zero Degree Maps between 3-Manifolds 463in [WZhl] show that cohopficity phenomenon is very complicated in the torsion case.In particular there are co-Hopf word hyperbolic groups which have infinitely manyends.Inspired by Questions 2.1 and 2.2 it is natural to askQuestion 2.3. Are the indices (including the infinity) <strong>of</strong> embeddings H —t Gbetween co-Hopf groups unique?3. Interactions with 3-manifold topologyDegree one maps define a partial order on Haken manifolds and hyperbolic3-manifolds. By Gordon-Luecke's theorem knots are determined by their complements[GL]. We say that a knot K 1-dominates a knot K' if the complement <strong>of</strong> K1-dominates the complement <strong>of</strong> K'. 1-domination among knots also gives a partialorder on knots. This partial order seems to provide a good measurement <strong>of</strong> complexity<strong>of</strong> 3-manifolds and knots. The reactions <strong>of</strong> non-zero degree maps between3-manifolds and 3-manifold topology are reflected in the following very flexibleQuestion 3.1. Suppose AI and N are 3-manifolds (knots) and AI 1-dominates(d-dominates) N.(1) Is a(AI) not "smaller" than a(N) for a topological invariant a(N) when a is either the rank <strong>of</strong> m, or Gromov'ssimplicial volume, or Haken number (<strong>of</strong> incompressible surfaces), or genus <strong>of</strong> knots;a(N) is a direct summand <strong>of</strong> a(M) when a is the homology group, and a(N) is afactor <strong>of</strong> a(M) if a is the Alexander polynomial <strong>of</strong> knots. The answer to Question3.1 (1) is still unknown for many invariants <strong>of</strong> knots and 3-manifolds, for examplecrossing number, unknotting number, Jones polynomial, knot energy, and tunnelnumber, etc. Li and Rubinstein are specially interested in Question 3.1 (1) forCasson invariant in order to prove it is a homotopy invariant [LRu].There are both positive and negative answers to Question 3.1 (2), depending onthe interpretation <strong>of</strong> the problem. On the negative side, Kawauchi has constructed,using the imitation method invented by himself, degree one maps between nonhomeomorphic3-manifolds AI and N with many topological invariants identical,see his survey paper [Ka]. On the positive side, there are many results. An easyoneis that if AI d-dominates N and both AI and N are aspherical Seifert manifolds,then the Euler number <strong>of</strong> AI is zero if and only if that <strong>of</strong> N is zero [Wl]. A deeperresult is Gromov-Thurston's Rigidity theorem, which says that a degree one mapbetween hyperbolic 3-manifolds <strong>of</strong> the same volume is homotopic to an isometry[Th2]. The following are some recent results in this direction.Theorem 3.1 ([So4], [Sol]). (1) For any V > 0, suppose f : AI —t N is a degreeone map between closed hyperbolic 3-manifolds with Vol(M) < V. Then there is a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!