11.07.2015 Views

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

366 Weiping Zhangwhere ch(g) is the odd Chern character associated to g.There is also an analytic pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> (4.2) by using heat kernels. For this onefirst applies a result <strong>of</strong> Booss and Wojciechowski (cf. [BW]) to show that thecomputation <strong>of</strong> ind T g is equivalent to the computation <strong>of</strong> the spectral flow <strong>of</strong> thelinear family <strong>of</strong> self-adjoint elliptic operators, acting <strong>of</strong> Y(S(TM) ® C N ), whichconnects D and gDg^1.The resulting spectral flow can then be computed byvariations<strong>of</strong> ^-invariants, where the heat kernels are naturally involved.The above ideas have been extended in [DZ1] to give a heat kernel pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> afamily extension <strong>of</strong> (4.2).5. An index theorem for Toeplitz operators on odddimensional manifolds with boundaryIn this section, we describe an extension <strong>of</strong> (4.2) to the case <strong>of</strong> manifolds withboundary, which was proved recently in my paper with Xianzhe Dai [DZ2]. Thisresult can be thought <strong>of</strong> as an odd dimensional analogue <strong>of</strong> the Atiyah-Patodi-Singerindex theorem described in Section 3.This section is divided into three subsections. In Subsection 4.1, we extend thedefinition <strong>of</strong> Toeplitz operators to the case <strong>of</strong> manifolds with boundary. In Subsection4.2, we define an ^-invariant for cylinders which will appear in the statement<strong>of</strong> the main result to be described in Subsection 4.3.5.1. Toeplitz operators on manifolds with boundaryLet M be an odd dimensional oriented spin manifold with (nonempty) boundarydM. Then dM is also oriented and spin. Let g be a Riemannian metric onTM such that it is <strong>of</strong> product structure near the boundary dM. Yet S(TM) be theHermitian bundle <strong>of</strong> spinors associated to (M,g). Since dM ^ 0, the Dirac operatorD : Y(S(TMj) —t Y(S(TMj) is no longer elliptic. To get an elliptic operator,one needs to impose suitable boundary conditions, and it turns out that again wewill adopt the boundary conditions introduced by Atiyah, Patodi and Singer [APS].Let DQM '• Y(S(TM)\QM) —t Y(S(TM)\QM) be the canonically induced Diracoperator on the boundary dM. Then DQM is elliptic and (formally) self-adjoint.For simplicity, we assume here that DQM is invertible, that is, ker DOM = 0.Let PdM,>o denote the Atiyah-Patodi-Singer projection from L 2 (S(TM)\QM)to L 2 >Q(S(TM)\QM). Then (D, PQM;>Q) forms a self-adjoint elliptic boundary problem.We will also denote the corresponding elliptic self-adjoint operator by Dp 8M>0 .Yet L 2 P >Q(S(TMj) be the space <strong>of</strong> the direct sum <strong>of</strong> eigenspaces <strong>of</strong> nonnegativeeigenvalues <strong>of</strong> Dp aM >0 . Yet Pp BM >0 >o denote the orthogonal projectionfrom L 2 (S(TM)) to L 2 PgM^; 0 (S(TM)).Now let C^ be the trivial complex vector bundle over M <strong>of</strong> rank N, whichcarries the trivial Hermitian metric and the trivial Hermitian connection. We extendPp BMi>0 ,>o to act as identity on C*.Let g : M —¥ U(N) be a smooth unitary automorphism <strong>of</strong> C N . Then g extendsto an action on S(TM) ® C^ by acting as identity on S(TM).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!