11.07.2015 Views

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Algebraic Structures on Valuations, Their Properties and Applications 761By the results <strong>of</strong> Section 1 (Val(V)) sm is a subalgebra <strong>of</strong> (PVal(V)) sm . It iseasy to see that the algebra structure is compatible with the grading, namelyIn particular we have(Vali(V)) sm CS) (Valj(V)) sm —• (Val ì+ j(Vj) sm .(Vali(Vj) sm ® (Val n -i(Vj) sm —• Dens(V).A version <strong>of</strong> the Poincaré duality theorem says that this is a perfect pairing. Aloreprecisely2.1.4 Theorem ([5]). The induced mapis an isomorphism.(Vali(Vj) sm —• (Val n -i(V)*) sm ® Dens(V)2.2. Even translation invariant continuous valuationsLet us denote by Val ev (V) the subspace <strong>of</strong> even translation invariant continuousvaluations. Then clearly (Val ev (V)) sm is a subalgebra <strong>of</strong> (Val(V)) sm . It turnsout that it satisfies a version <strong>of</strong> the hard Lefschetz theorem which we are going todescribe.Let us fix on V a scalar product. Let D denote the unit ball with respect tothis product. Let us define an operator A : Val(V) —y Val(V). For a valuation £ Val(V) set(AcP)(K):=^\ e=Q cP(K+ eD).(Note that by a result <strong>of</strong> P. McMullen [17] (K + sD) is a polynomial in e > 0 <strong>of</strong>degree at most n.) It is easy to see that A preserves the parity <strong>of</strong> valuations anddecreases the degree <strong>of</strong> homogeneity by 1. In particularA:Vair(V)^Val^Li(V).The following result is a version <strong>of</strong> the hard Lefschetz theorem.2.2.1 Theorem ([4]). Let k > n/2. ThenA2k-n . (Vall v (V)y m —• (Val e fi_ k (Vj) smis an isomorphism. In particular for 1 < i < 2k — n the mapis injective.A* : (Val e k V (V)) sm —• (VallfifiV)) 8 " 1Note that the pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> this result is based on the solution <strong>of</strong> the cosine transformproblem due to J. Bernstein and the author [6], which is the problem from(Gelfand style) integral geometry motivated by stochastic geometry and going backto G. Alatheron [16].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!