11.07.2015 Views

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fukaya Categories and Deformations 3597(X), because it contains only Lagrangian submanifolds which lie in M. However,that difference may disappear if one passes to derived categories:Conjecture 5. In the situation <strong>of</strong> Assumption 2, there is a canonical equivalence<strong>of</strong> triangulated categoriesD*(Ï(M C X) gen ® Q[t -i] [[t] ] A t ) - D*(f(X)).In comparison with the previous conjecture, Assumption 2 is far more importanthere. The idea is that there should be an analogue <strong>of</strong> Theorem 3 for D*(9r(X)),saying that this category is split-generated by vanishing cycles, hence by objectswhich are also present in J(M c X).To pull together the various speculations, suppose that Y = CP" +1 for somen > 3; X c Y is a hypersurface <strong>of</strong> degree n + 2; and D c X is the intersection<strong>of</strong> two such hypersurfaces. Then D 7 '('J(Mj) is split-generated by finitelymanyobjects, hence Tw 7 '('J(Mj) is at least in principle accessible to computation.Conjecture 4 together with (2), (4) tells us that HH 2 (7(M),'3 : (Mj) =ëHH 2 (Tw 7 '('J(Mj),Tw 7 '('J(Mjj) is at most one-dimensional, so an A,»-deformation<strong>of</strong> Tw 7 '('J(Mj) is unique up to a change <strong>of</strong> the parameter t. From this deformation,Conjecture 5 would enable one to find D*(9r(X)), again with the indeterminacy inthe parameter (fixing this is somewhat like computing the mirror map).Acknowledgements. Obviously, the ideas outlined here owe greatly to Fukaya andKontsevich. The author is equally indebted to Auroux, Donaldson, Getzler, Joyce,Khovanov, Smith, and Thomas (an incomplete list), all <strong>of</strong> whom have influenced histhinking considerably. The preparation <strong>of</strong> this talk at the Institute for AdvancedStudy was supported by NSF grant DMS-9729992.References[1] M. Chas and D. Sullivan, String topology, Preprint math.GT/9911159.[2] K. Cieliebak, A. Floer, and H. H<strong>of</strong>er, Symplectic homology II: a general construction,Math. Z. 218 (1995), 103^122.[3] Ya. Eliashberg, A. Gi ventai, and H. H<strong>of</strong>er, Introduction to symplectic fieldtheory, Geom. Funct. Anal. Special Volume, Part II (2000), 560^673.[4] K. Fukaya, Asymptotic analysis, multivalued Morse theory, and mirror symmetry,Preprint 2002.[5] , Deformation theory, homological algebra, and mirror symmetry,Preprint, December 2001.[6] , Floer homology and mirror symmetry II, Preprint 2001.[7] , Morse homotopy, .4 œ -categories, and Floer homologies, Proceedings <strong>of</strong>GARC workshop on Geometry and Topology (H. J. Kim, ed.), Seoul NationalUniversity, 1993.[8] K. Fukaya and Y.-G. Oh, Zero-loop open strings in the cotangent bundle andMorse homotopy, Asian J. Math. 1 (1998), 96^180.[9] K. Fukaya, Y.-G. Oh, H. Ohta, and K. Ono, Lagrangian intersection Floertheory - anomaly and obstruction, Preprint, 2000.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!