11.07.2015 Views

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

698 Juha HeinonenBranched coverings constructed by using the double suspension are obviouscandidates for such mappings. In [15, 9.1], we give an example <strong>of</strong> a branchedcovering / : S 3 —¥ S 3 such that for every homeomorphism fi : S 3 —¥ S 3 , / o fifails to be quasiregular. The example is based on a geometric decomposition spacearising from Bing's double [34].We close this article by commenting on the lack <strong>of</strong> direct pro<strong>of</strong>s for somefundamental properties <strong>of</strong> quasiregular mappings related to branching. For example,it is known that for each n > 3 there exists K(n) > 1 such that every K(n)-quasiregular mapping is a local homeomorphism [25], [28, p. 232]. All knownpro<strong>of</strong>s for this fact are indirect, exploiting the Liouville theorem, and in particularthere is no numerical estimate for K(n). It has been conjectured that the windingmapping (r,9,z) >-¥ (r,29,z) is the extremal here (cf. Section 6). Thus, if one usesthe inner dilatation Ki(fi) <strong>of</strong> a quasiregular mapping, then conjecturally Ki(fi) < 2implies that Bf = 0 for a quasiregular mapping / in R" for n > 3 [29, p. 76].Ostensibly different, but obviously a related issue, arises in search <strong>of</strong> Bloch'sconstant for quasiregular mappings. Namely, by exploiting normal families, Eremenko[10] recently proved that for given n > 3 and K > 1, there exists bo =bo(n, K) > 0 such that every if-quasiregular mapping / : R" —t S n has an inversebranch in some ball in S n <strong>of</strong> radius bo- No numerical estimate for 6 0 is known. Aloregenerally, despite the deep results on value distribution <strong>of</strong> quasiregular mappings,uncovered by Rickman over the past quarter century, the affect <strong>of</strong> branching onvalue distribution is unknown, cf. [29, p. 96].References[1] Al. Bonk and J. Heinonen, in preparation.[2] Al. Bonk, J. Heinonen, and S. Rohde, Doubling conformai densities, J. reineangew. Alath., 541 (2001), 117-141.[3] Al. Bonk, J. Heinonen, and E. Saksman, The quasiconformal Jacobian problem,preprint (2002).[4] Al. Bonk and B. Kleiner, Quasisymmetric parametrizations <strong>of</strong> two-dimensionalmetric spheres, Inventiones Alath., (to appear).[5] Al. Bonk and U. Lang, Bi-Lipschitz parametrizations <strong>of</strong> surfaces, in preparation.[6] J. W. Cannon, The characterization <strong>of</strong> topological manifolds <strong>of</strong> dimension n >5, Proceedings ICA1 (Helsinki, 1978), Acad. Sei. Fenn. Helsinki, (1980), 449-454.[7] G. David and S. Semmes, Strong A^ weights, Sobolev inequalities and quasiconformalmappings, in Analysis and partial differential equations, LectureNotes in Pure and Appi. Alath., 122, Dekker, New York (1990), 101-111.[8] S. K. Donaldson and D. P. Sullivan, Quasiconformal 4-manifolds, Acta Alath.,163 (1989), 181-252.[9] R. D. Edwards, The topology <strong>of</strong> manifolds and cell-like maps, Proceedings ICA1(Helsinki, 1978) Acad. Sei. Fenn. Helsinki, (1980), 111-127.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!