11.07.2015 Views

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hilbert Schemes <strong>of</strong> Points on Surface 489If n :Y —¥ X/G is only a crêpant resolution but not hyperkähler, then usuallyH* rb ([X/G\) and H*(Y) are not isomorphic as rings. However in [51] a preciseconjecture is made relating the two: One has to correct H* rb ([X/G\) by Gromov-Witten invariants coming from classes <strong>of</strong> rational curves Y contracted by n. In thecase <strong>of</strong> the Hilbert scheme these curve classes are the multiples <strong>of</strong> a unique class.The conjecture was verified for S^.5. Moduli <strong>of</strong> vector bundlesWe denote by Mg(r,ci,c 2 ) the moduli space <strong>of</strong> Gieseker F-semistable coherentsheaves <strong>of</strong> rank ronS with Chern classes ci, c 2 . Here a sheaf T <strong>of</strong> rank r > 0 onS is called semistable, \fx(f3®H n )/r' < x(J 7 ®H n )/r for all sufficiently large n andfor all subsheaves Q C T <strong>of</strong> positive rank r'. As Mg(l,0,c 2 ) ~ Pic°(S) x S^- C2 \ theHilbert scheme <strong>of</strong> points is a special case. We will <strong>of</strong>ten restrict our attention to thecase <strong>of</strong> r = 2 and write Mg(ci,c 2 ). The Hilbert schemes <strong>of</strong> points are related in severalways to the Mg(ci,c 2 ). The most basic tie is the Serre correspondence whichsays that under mild assumptions rank two vector bundles on S can be constructedas extensions <strong>of</strong> ideal sheaves <strong>of</strong> finite subschemes by line bundles. Related to thisis the dependence <strong>of</strong> the Mg(ci,c 2 ) on the ample divisor H via a system <strong>of</strong> wallsand chambers. This has been studied by a number <strong>of</strong> authors (e.g. [49],[23],[18]).Assume for simplicity that S is simply connected. A class £ £ H 2 (S,Z) defines awall <strong>of</strong> type (01,02) if £ + ci £ 2H 2 (S, Z) and c\ — 4c2 < £ 2 < 0. The correspondingwall is W^ = {a £ H 2 (S,H) | a • £ = 0}. The connected components <strong>of</strong> thecomplement <strong>of</strong> the walls in H 2 (X, R) are called the chambers <strong>of</strong> type (01,02). If asheaf £ £ Mg(ci,c 2 ) is unstable with respect to F, then there is a wall W^ withF£ < 0 < F£ and an extension0^1 z ®A^£^l w xB^0,where A,B £ Pic(S) with A — B = £ and lz, lw are the ideal sheaves <strong>of</strong> zerodimensional schemes on S. It follows that Mg(ci,c 2 ) depends only on the chamber<strong>of</strong> H and the set theoretic change under wallcrossing is given in terms <strong>of</strong> Hilbertschemes <strong>of</strong> points on S. In the case e.g. <strong>of</strong> rational surfaces and K3-surfaces,the change can be described as an explicit sequence <strong>of</strong> blow ups along P*. bundlesover products S^ x S^ followed by blow downs in another direction [23],[18].The change <strong>of</strong> the Betti and Hodge numbers under wallcrossing can be explicitlydeterminedand this can be used e.g. to determine the Hodge numbers <strong>of</strong> Mg (01,02)for rational surfaces. For suitable choices <strong>of</strong> H one can find the generating functionsin terms <strong>of</strong> modular forms and Jacobi forms [27].The appearance <strong>of</strong> modular forms is in accord with the S-duality conjectures[54] from theoretical physics, which predict that under suitable assumptions thegenerating functions for the the Euler numbers <strong>of</strong> moduli spaces <strong>of</strong> sheaves onsurfaces should be given by modular forms. One <strong>of</strong> the motivating examples forthis conjecture is the case that S is a K3-surface. In this case the conjecture is that,if Mg(ci,c 2 ) is smooth, then it has the same Betti numbers as the Hilbert scheme <strong>of</strong>points on S <strong>of</strong> the same dimension. Assuming this, the formula (2.1) for the Hilbert

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!