11.07.2015 Views

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

International Congress of Mathematicians

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

766 P. Bianewith classical cumulants associated with random matrices, and with characters <strong>of</strong>symmetric groups. Finally in section 5 we explain the asymptotic behaviour <strong>of</strong>representations <strong>of</strong> symmetric groups in terms <strong>of</strong> free probability concepts.2. Freeness and random matricesThe usual framework for free probability is a von Neumann algebra A, equippedwith a faithful, tracial, normal state r. To any self-adjoint element X £ A one canassociate its distribution, the probability measure on the real line, uniquely determinedby the identity r(X n ) = f- R x n p(dx) for all n > 1. This makes it natural tothink <strong>of</strong> the elements <strong>of</strong> A as noneommutative random variables, and <strong>of</strong> r as an expectationmap, and one usually calls noneommutative probability space such a pair(A,T). Although a great deal <strong>of</strong> the theory, especially the combinatorial side, canbe developped in a purely algebraic way, assuming only that A is a complex algebrawith unit, and r a complex linear functional, we shall stick to the von Neumannframework in the present exposition.Given (A, T), one considers a family {AJ; i £ 1} <strong>of</strong> von Neumann subalgebras.This family is called a free family if the following holds: for any k > 1 and fc-tuplecti,..., ak £ A such that• each aj belongs to some algebra A tj ,• T(OJ) = 0 for all j,with ii ^ i 2 ,i 2 ^ h, • • •, iu-i ^ ik,one has r(ai... ak) = 0.Moreover, a family <strong>of</strong> elements <strong>of</strong> A is called free if the von Neumann algebraseach <strong>of</strong> them generates form a free family. Freeness is a noneommutativenotion analogous to the independence <strong>of</strong> a-fields in probability theory, but whichincorporates also the notion <strong>of</strong> algebraic independence.Observe that if cti and a 2 are free elements in (A,T), and one defines thecentered elements ô, = a, — r(a,)l then one can conputer(aia 2 ) = r(âiâ 2 ) -V r(ai)r(a 2 ) = r(ai)r(a 2 )where the freeness condition has been used to get r(âiÔ2) = 0. Actually, if {Affi £1} is a free family, it is not dificult to see that one can compute the value <strong>of</strong> r onany product <strong>of</strong> the form cti... ak, where each aj belongs to some <strong>of</strong> the A t 's, interms <strong>of</strong> the quantities r(aj t ... a-j l ) where all the elements aj 1 ,..., a-j l belong tothe same subalgebra. This implies that the value <strong>of</strong> r on the algebra generatedby the family {Affi £ 1} is completely determined by the restrictions <strong>of</strong> r toeach <strong>of</strong> these subalgebras. However the problem <strong>of</strong> finding an explicit formula isnontrivial, and this is where combinatorics comes in. We shall describe Speicher'stheory <strong>of</strong> noncrossing cumulants, which solves this problem, in the next section, butbefore that we explain how free probability is relevant to understand large randommatrices.Consider n random N x N matrices X} ,..., X n , <strong>of</strong> the formXf ] = UjDf ] U* (2.1)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!